These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10063842)

  • 21. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer.
    Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
    Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.
    Pickhardt PJ; Schumacher C; Kim DH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 19638863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.
    Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of colonic distention on superiority of supine versus prone views in screening computed tomographic colonography.
    Michel SJ; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Taylor AJ
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 17825740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.
    Park SH; Ha HK; Kim MJ; Kim KW; Kim AY; Yang DH; Lee MG; Kim PN; Shin YM; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Min YI
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 15770042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography].
    Laghi A; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Iannaccone R; Iori S; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 11307507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
    Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity].
    Kerker J; Albes G; Roer N; Montag M; Budde T; Schaefer A
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 18393151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interactive registration between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography using band-height images.
    Song Y; Lee H; Kang HC; Shin J; Hong GS; Park SH; Lee J; Shin YG
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jan; 80():124-136. PubMed ID: 27936413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography.
    Näppi J; Okamura A; Frimmel H; Dachman A; Yoshida H
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 15935968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
    Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Registration of the endoluminal surfaces of the colon derived from prone and supine CT colonography.
    Roth HR; McClelland JR; Boone DJ; Modat M; Cardoso MJ; Hampshire TE; Hu M; Punwani S; Ourselin S; Slabaugh GG; Halligan S; Hawkes DJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3077-89. PubMed ID: 21815381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.
    Li H; Pineau B; Santago P
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Mar; 18(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15645333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy.
    Morrin MM; Kruskal JB; Farrell RJ; Goldberg SN; McGee JB; Raptopoulos V
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):913-8. PubMed ID: 10587120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Findings on optical colonoscopy after positive CT colonography exam.
    Cornett D; Barancin C; Roeder B; Reichelderfer M; Frick T; Gopal D; Kim D; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor A; Pfau P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 103(8):2068-74. PubMed ID: 18564114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Goh V; Morley S; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 12944595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deformable registration of supine and prone colons for computed tomographic colonography.
    Suh JW; Wyatt CL
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 19940658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.
    Lefere PA; Gryspeerdt SS; Dewyspelaere J; Baekelandt M; Van Holsbeeck BG
    Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 12147834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feasibility of automated matching of supine and prone CT-colonography examinations.
    de Vries AH; Truyen R; van der Peijl J; Florie J; van Gelder RE; Gerritsen F; Stoker J
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Sep; 79(945):740-4. PubMed ID: 16641418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.