BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10063863)

  • 21. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them?
    Ayyala RS; Chorlton M; Behrman RH; Kornguth PJ; Slanetz PJ
    Radiographics; 2008; 28(7):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 19001654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modeling, validation and application of a mathematical tissue-equivalent breast phantom for linear slot-scanning digital mammography.
    Hussein K; Vaughan CL; Douglas TS
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1533-53. PubMed ID: 19229099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct digital mammography using a scanned-slot CCD imaging system.
    Yaffe MJ
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 8302210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scanned-projection digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM; Mawdsley GE; Fenster A; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 3683300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automatic exposure control for a slot scanning full field digital mammography system.
    Elbakri IA; Lakshminarayanan AV; Tesic MM
    Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2763-70. PubMed ID: 16266089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The first trial of phase contrast imaging for digital full-field mammography using a practical molybdenum x-ray tube.
    Tanaka T; Honda C; Matsuo S; Noma K; Oohara H; Nitta N; Ota S; Tsuchiya K; Sakashita Y; Yamada A; Yamasaki M; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):385-96. PubMed ID: 15973129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A slot-scanned photodiode-array/CCD hybrid detector for digital mammography.
    Mainprize JG; Ford NL; Yin S; Tümer T; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 11865992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images.
    Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Ved H; Baker SP; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiology; 2002 Dec; 225(3):801-7. PubMed ID: 12461264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contrast-detail detectability analysis: comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system.
    Liu H; Fajardo LL; Barrett JR; Baxter RA
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Mar; 4(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 9084777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detecting film-screen artifacts in mammography using a model-based approach.
    Highnam R; Brady M; English R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Oct; 18(10):1016-24. PubMed ID: 10628960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short communication: anomalous image quality phantom scores in magnification mammography: evidence of phase contrast enhancement.
    Kotre CJ; Birch IP; Robson KJ
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 75(890):170-3. PubMed ID: 11893641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mammographic scanning equalization radiography.
    Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1505-15. PubMed ID: 8289735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Full field digital mammography scanner.
    Tesic MM; Piccaro MF; Munier B
    Eur J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 31(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 10477093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved tool for testing screen-film contact in mammography.
    Mount CJ; Gray JE
    Radiographics; 1990 Nov; 10(6):1049-54. PubMed ID: 2259760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Quantification Method for Breast Tissue Thickness and Iodine Concentration Using Photon-Counting Detector.
    Han S
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):594-603. PubMed ID: 25708894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiographic techniques in screen-film mammography.
    LaVoy TR; Huda W; Ogden KM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 12132948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.