These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10064028)

  • 41. Genetic selection and conservation of genetic diversity*.
    Blackburn HD
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2012 Aug; 47 Suppl 4():249-54. PubMed ID: 22827378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The diversity of bovine MHC class II DRB3 and DQA1 alleles in different herds of Japanese Black and Holstein cattle in Japan.
    Miyasaka T; Takeshima SN; Matsumoto Y; Kobayashi N; Matsuhashi T; Miyazaki Y; Tanabe Y; Ishibashi K; Sentsui H; Aida Y
    Gene; 2011 Feb; 472(1-2):42-9. PubMed ID: 20965236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of breeding strategies for polledness in dairy cattle using a newly developed simulation framework for quantitative and Mendelian traits.
    Scheper C; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Dressel H; Swalve H; König S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):50. PubMed ID: 27357942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessing priorities for conservation in Tuscan cattle breeds using microsatellites.
    Bozzi R; Alvarez I; Crovetti A; Fernández I; De Petris D; Goyache F
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 22436177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Human and ecological determinants of the spatial structure of local breed diversity.
    Colino-Rabanal VJ; Rodríguez-Díaz R; Blanco-Villegas MJ; Peris SJ; Lizana M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6452. PubMed ID: 29691460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Long-Term Impact of Optimum Contribution Selection Strategies on Local Livestock Breeds with Historical Introgression Using the Example of German Angler Cattle.
    Wang Y; Segelke D; Emmerling R; Bennewitz J; Wellmann R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Dec; 7(12):4009-4018. PubMed ID: 29089375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pedigree data indicate rapid inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity within populations of native, traditional dog breeds of conservation concern.
    Jansson M; Laikre L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202849. PubMed ID: 30208042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biodiversity versus emergencies: the impact of restocking on Animal Genetic Resources after disaster.
    Heffernan C
    Disasters; 2009 Apr; 33(2):239-52. PubMed ID: 18717703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prediction of inbreeding in commercial females maintained by rotational mating with partially isolated sire lines.
    Honda T; Nomura T; Mukai F
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 16191043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Shortcomings of current genetic evaluation systems.
    Bourdon RM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2308-23. PubMed ID: 9781487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A WebGIS platform for the monitoring of Farm Animal Genetic Resources (GENMON).
    Duruz S; Flury C; Matasci G; Joerin F; Widmer I; Joost S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176362. PubMed ID: 28453561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reproductive biotechnology and gene mapping: tools for conserving rare breeds of livestock.
    Long JA
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Jul; 43 Suppl 2():83-8. PubMed ID: 18638108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes.
    Bijma P; Van Arendonk JA; Woolliams JA
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 11325188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Investigations on merging breeds in genetic conservation schemes.
    Bennewitz J; Simianer H; Meuwissen TH
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jun; 91(6):2512-9. PubMed ID: 18487675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genetic diversity analysis of two commercial breeds of pigs using genomic and pedigree data.
    Zanella R; Peixoto JO; Cardoso FF; Cardoso LL; Biegelmeyer P; Cantão ME; Otaviano A; Freitas MS; Caetano AR; Ledur MC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():24. PubMed ID: 27029213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Characterization of bovine MHC class II DRB3 diversity in South American Holstein cattle populations.
    Takeshima SN; Giovambattista G; Okimoto N; Matsumoto Y; Rogberg-Muñoz A; Acosta TJ; Onuma M; Aida Y
    Tissue Antigens; 2015 Dec; 86(6):419-30. PubMed ID: 26514650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Defining multiple-trait objectives for sustainable genetic improvement.
    Gibson JP; Wilton JW
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2303-7. PubMed ID: 9781486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Selection for uniformity in livestock by exploiting genetic heterogeneity of residual variance.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P; Hill WG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2008; 40(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 18096114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Breeding for profit: synergism between genetic improvement and livestock production (a review).
    Harris DL; Newman S
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Aug; 72(8):2178-200. PubMed ID: 7982849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.