These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10064034)

  • 1. Accuracy of application of USDA beef quality and yield grades using the traditional system and the proposed seven-grade yield grade system.
    Kerth CR; Miller MF; Wise JW; Lansdell JL; Ramsey CB
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Jan; 77(1):116-9. PubMed ID: 10064034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses using video image analysis.
    Steiner R; Wyle AM; Vote DJ; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Wise JW; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Sep; 81(9):2239-46. PubMed ID: 12968699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulated instrument augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses.
    Belk KE; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):522-7. PubMed ID: 9498361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system (Computer Vision System) to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. United States Department of Agriculture.
    Cannell RC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Chapman PL; Scanga JA; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2002 May; 80(5):1195-201. PubMed ID: 12019606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-component video image analysis system (VIASCAN) as a predictor of beef carcass red meat yield percentage and for augmenting application of USDA yield grades.
    Cannell RC; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Wise JW; Clayton RP; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Nov; 77(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 10568462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National Beef Quality Audit-2016: In-plant survey of carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers.
    Boykin CA; Eastwood LC; Harris MK; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Arnold AN; Hasty JD; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Delmore RJ; Martin JN; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Pfeiffer MM; Lawrence TE; McEvers TJ; Schmidt TB; Maddock RJ; Johnson DD; Carr CC; Scheffler JM; Pringle TD; Stelzleni AM; Gottlieb J; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jul; 95(7):2993-3002. PubMed ID: 28727109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National Beef Quality Audit-2011: In-plant survey of targeted carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, value, and marketing of fed steers and heifers.
    Moore MC; Gray GD; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Raines CR; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; Igo JL; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Lawrence TE; Delmore RJ; Christensen LM; Shackelford SD; King DA; Wheeler TL; Meadows LR; O'Connor ME
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5143-51. PubMed ID: 22952369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of equations utilizing lamb vision system output to predict lamb carcass fabrication yields.
    Cunha BC; Belk KE; Scanga JA; LeValley SB; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):2069-76. PubMed ID: 15309954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National Beef Quality Audit-2011: Survey of instrument grading assessments of beef carcass characteristics.
    Gray GD; Moore MC; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Raines CR; Lawrence TE; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Delmore RJ; Shackelford SD; King DA; Wheeler TL; Meadows LR; O'Connor ME
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5152-8. PubMed ID: 22952354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting red meat yields in carcasses from beef-type and calf-fed Holstein steers using the United States Department of Agriculture calculated yield grade.
    Lawrence TE; Elam NA; Miller MF; Brooks JC; Hilton GG; VanOverbeke DL; McKeith FK; Killefer J; Montgomery TH; Allen DM; Griffin DB; Delmore RJ; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Yates DA; Hutcheson JP
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jun; 88(6):2139-43. PubMed ID: 20190173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system.
    Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 12597385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of sex-class, USDA yield grade and USDA quality grade on seam fat trim from the primals of beef carcasses.
    Jones DK; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Jul; 68(7):1987-91. PubMed ID: 2384389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opportunities to improve the accuracy of the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation through precision agriculture.
    Jaborek JR; Relling AE; Fluharty FL; Moeller SJ; Zerby HN
    Transl Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 4(2):txaa033. PubMed ID: 32705031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National Beef Quality Audit-2000: survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers.
    McKenna DR; Roebert DL; Bates PK; Schmidt TB; Hale DS; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Brooks JC; Morgan JB; Montgomery TH; Belk KE; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2002 May; 80(5):1212-22. PubMed ID: 12019608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National Beef Quality Audit - 2016: Survey of carcass characteristics through instrument grading assessments.
    Boykin CA; Eastwood LC; Harris MK; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Arnold AN; Hasty JD; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Delmore RJ; Martin JN; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Pfeiffer MM; Lawrence TE; McEvers TJ; Schmidt TB; Maddock RJ; Johnson DD; Carr CC; Scheffler JM; Pringle TD; Stelzleni AM; Gottlieb J; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jul; 95(7):3003-3011. PubMed ID: 28727107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National Beef Quality Audit-2022: in-plant assessments of quality and yield determining carcass characteristics of fed steers and heifers.
    Mayer TR; Borders SE; Schwartz TE; Gehring KB; Griffin DB; Kerth CR; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Nair MN; Pfeiffer MM; Mafi GG; Harr KM; Lawrence TE; Tennant TC; Lucherk LW; O'Quinn TG; Beyer ES; Bass PD; Garcia LG; Bohrer BM; Pempek JA; Garmyn AJ; Maddock RJ; Carr CC; Pringle TD; Scheffler TL; Scheffler JM; Stelzleni AM; Gonzalez JM; Underwood KR; Harsh BN; Waters CM; Savell JW
    Transl Anim Sci; 2024; 8():txae098. PubMed ID: 39005630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using measurements of muscle color, pH, and electrical impedance to augment the current USDA beef quality grading standards and improve the accuracy and precision of sorting carcasses into palatability groups.
    Wulf DM; Page JK
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Oct; 78(10):2595-607. PubMed ID: 11048925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimates of subprimal yields from beef carcasses as affected by USDA grades, subcutaneous fat trim level, and carcass sex class and type.
    Griffin DB; Savell JW; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2411-30. PubMed ID: 1506304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National Beef Quality Audit-2005: survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers.
    Garcia LG; Nicholson KL; Hoffman TW; Lawrence TE; Hale DS; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Vanoverbeke DL; Morgan JB; Belk KE; Field TG; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3533-43. PubMed ID: 18676726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of postmortem aging and USDA quality grade on Warner-Bratzler shear force values of seventeen individual beef muscles.
    Gruber SL; Tatum JD; Scanga JA; Chapman PL; Smith GC; Belk KE
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Dec; 84(12):3387-96. PubMed ID: 17093232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.