These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10064034)

  • 21. Comparison of USDA quality grade with tendertec for the assessment of beef palatability.
    George MH; Tatum JD; Dolezal HG; Morgan JB; Wise JW; Calkins CR; Gordon T; Reagan JO; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Jun; 75(6):1538-46. PubMed ID: 9250515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Slaughter plant location, USDA quality grade, external fat thickness, and aging time effects on sensory characteristics of beef loin strip steak.
    Miller MF; Kerth CR; Wise JW; Lansdell JL; Stowell JE; Ramsey CB
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Mar; 75(3):662-7. PubMed ID: 9078481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of the lamb vision system as a predictor of lamb carcass red meat yield percentage.
    Brady AS; Belk KE; LeValley SB; Dalsted NL; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jun; 81(6):1488-98. PubMed ID: 12817497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tenderness classification of beef: IV. Effect of USDA quality grade on the palatability of "tender" beef longissimus when cooked well done.
    Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Apr; 77(4):882-8. PubMed ID: 10328352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. National Beef Quality Audit-1995: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes.
    Boleman SL; Boleman SJ; Morgan WW; Hale DS; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Ames RP; Smith MT; Tatum JD; Field TG; Smith GC; Gardner BA; Morgan JB; Northcutt SL; Dolezal HG; Gill DR; Ray FK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jan; 76(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 9464889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Technical note: the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation requires modification to reflect the current longissimus muscle area to hot carcass weight relationship.
    Lawrence TE; Farrow RL; Zollinger BL; Spivey KS
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 18310492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beef customer satisfaction: trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values.
    Lorenzen CL; Miller RK; Taylors JF; Neely TR; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Buyek MJ; Reagan JO; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 12597384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings.
    Neely TR; Lorenzen CL; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Taylor JF; Buyck MJ; Reagan JO; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Apr; 76(4):1027-33. PubMed ID: 9581926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Color stability and tenderness variations within the gluteus medius from beef top sirloin butts.
    Apple JK; Machete JB; Stackhouse RJ; Johnson TM; Keys CA; Yancey JW
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jan; 96(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 23896137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feeding performance, carcass characteristics, and tenderness attributes of steers sorted by the Igenity tenderness panel and fed zilpaterol hydrochloride.
    McEvers TJ; Nichols WT; Hutcheson JP; Edmonds MD; Lawrence TE
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Nov; 90(11):4140-7. PubMed ID: 22859750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Establishing an appropriate mode of comparison for measuring the performance of marbling score output from video image analysis beef carcass grading systems.
    Moore CB; Bass PD; Green MD; Chapman PL; O'Connor ME; Yates LD; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC; Belk KE
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2464-75. PubMed ID: 20348376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of USDA beef quality grade and cooking on fatty acid composition of neutral and polar lipid fractions.
    Legako JF; Dinh TT; Miller MF; Brooks JC
    Meat Sci; 2015 Feb; 100():246-55. PubMed ID: 25460133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of volatile compounds, neutral and polar lipid fatty acids of four beef muscles from USDA Choice and Select graded carcasses and their relationships with consumer palatability scores and intramuscular fat content.
    Hunt MR; Legako JF; Dinh TT; Garmyn AJ; O'Quinn TG; Corbin CH; Rathmann RJ; Brooks JC; Miller MF
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jun; 116():91-101. PubMed ID: 26874592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The efficacy of adding a minimum adjusted fat thickness requirement to the USDA beef quality grading standards for select grade beef.
    Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Jun; 72(6):1502-7. PubMed ID: 8071175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.
    Wheeler TL; Cundiff LV; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1177-89. PubMed ID: 15080341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The USDA quality grades may mislead consumers.
    DeVuyst EA; Lusk JL; DeVuyst MA
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):3142-8. PubMed ID: 24802037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benchmarking carcass characteristics and muscles from commercially identified beef and dairy cull cow carcasses for Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory attributes.
    Stelzleni AM; Patten LE; Johnson DD; Calkins CR; Gwartney BL
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2631-8. PubMed ID: 17565055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The efficacy of three objective systems for identifying beef cuts that can be guaranteed tender.
    Wheeler TL; Vote D; Leheska JM; Shackelford SD; Belk KE; Wulf DM; Gwartney BL; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Dec; 80(12):3315-27. PubMed ID: 12542173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of hot-fat trimming on factors associated with the subprimal yield of beef carcasses.
    Ahmed PO; Miller MF; Shackelford SD; Johnson LP; Williams SE; McCann MA; Reagan JO
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Feb; 70(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 1548206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Video image analysis as a potential grading system for Uruguayan beef carcasses.
    Vote DJ; Bowling MB; Cunha BC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Montossi F; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2376-90. PubMed ID: 19395512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.