BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10065380)

  • 1. Chemosensory event-related potentials to trigeminal stimuli change in relation to the interval between repetitive stimulation of the nasal mucosa.
    Hummel T; Kobal G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 10065380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-course of trigeminal versus olfactory stimulation: evidence from chemosensory evoked potentials.
    Flohr EL; Boesveldt S; Haehner A; Iannilli E; Sinding C; Hummel T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 25697131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responses of rat medullary dorsal horn neurons following intranasal noxious chemical stimulation: effects of stimulus intensity, duration, and interstimulus interval.
    Peppel P; Anton F
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2260-75. PubMed ID: 8120581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responses to olfactory and intranasal trigeminal stimuli: relation to the respiratory cycle.
    Haehner A; Gruenewald G; Dibenedetto M; Hummel T
    Neuroscience; 2011 Feb; 175():178-83. PubMed ID: 21145944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation.
    Frasnelli J; Heilmann S; Hummel T
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 May; 362(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 15147782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateralisation of intranasal trigeminal chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Guérit JM; Mouraux A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2008 Feb; 38(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18329547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Mouraux A; Bertrand B; Guerit JM; Hummel T
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2006; 36(2):53-62. PubMed ID: 16844543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potentials to intranasal trigeminal stimuli change in relation to stimulus concentration and stimulus duration.
    Frasnelli J; Lötsch J; Hummel T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Feb; 20(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 12684563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemosensory event-related potentials during sleep--a pilot study.
    Stuck BA; Weitz H; Hörmann K; Maurer JT; Hummel T
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 16934401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different sensitivity of pain-related chemosensory potentials evoked by stimulation with CO2, tooth pulp event-related potentials, and acoustic event-related potentials to the tranquilizer diazepam.
    Thürauf N; Ditterich W; Kobal G
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 38(6):545-55. PubMed ID: 7888293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli?
    Scheibe M; Opatz O; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Aug; 266(8):1323-6. PubMed ID: 19002476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.
    Stuck BA; Frey S; Freiburg C; Hörmann K; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1367-75. PubMed ID: 16651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials in response to repetitive painful chemical stimulation of the nasal mucosa.
    Hummel T; Gruber M; Pauli E; Kobal G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 92(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 7523087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arousal responses to olfactory or trigeminal stimulation during sleep.
    Stuck BA; Stieber K; Frey S; Freiburg C; Hörmann K; Maurer JT; Hummel T
    Sleep; 2007 Apr; 30(4):506-10. PubMed ID: 17520795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Topographical differences in distribution and responsiveness of trigeminal sensitivity within the human nasal mucosa.
    Meusel T; Negoias S; Scheibe M; Hummel T
    Pain; 2010 Nov; 151(2):516-521. PubMed ID: 20817356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of short inter-stimulus intervals on olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials.
    Kassab A; Schaub F; Vent J; Hüttenbrink KB; Damm M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1250-6. PubMed ID: 19863320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chemosensory event-related potentials in the investigation of interactions between the olfactory and the somatosensory (trigeminal) systems.
    Livermore A; Hummel T; Kobal G
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Sep; 83(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 1381671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Topographical differences in the trigeminal sensitivity of the human nasal mucosa.
    Scheibe M; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Neuroreport; 2006 Sep; 17(13):1417-20. PubMed ID: 16932150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa.
    Kobal G; Hummel C
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 2454788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intranasal trigeminal chemosensitivity in patients with postviral and post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction.
    Ren Y; Yang L; Guo Y; Xutao M; Li K; Wei Y
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):974-80. PubMed ID: 22830564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.