210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10065526)
1. Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine: minimally invasive spine surgery. A prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion.
Regan JJ; Yuan H; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):402-11. PubMed ID: 10065526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Instrumented laparoscopic spinal fusion. Preliminary Results.
Zucherman JF; Zdeblick TA; Bailey SA; Mahvi D; Hsu KY; Kohrs D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(18):2029-34;discussion 2034-5. PubMed ID: 8578381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.
Regan JJ; Aronoff RJ; Ohnmeiss DD; Sengupta DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2171-4. PubMed ID: 10543017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Lee GA; Orbegoso CM; Haggerty CJ; Fedder IL; Griffith SL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2147-53. PubMed ID: 10543014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Zdeblick TA; David SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Oct; 25(20):2682-7. PubMed ID: 11034657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperitoneal laparoscopic exposure for lumbar interbody fusion.
Lieberman IH; Willsher PC; Litwin DE; Salo PT; Kraetschmer BG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Feb; 25(4):509-14; discussion 515. PubMed ID: 10707399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic discectomy with anterior lumbar interbody fusion. A preliminary review.
Mathews HH; Evans MT; Molligan HJ; Long BH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Aug; 20(16):1797-802. PubMed ID: 7502137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Chung SK; Lee SH; Lim SR; Kim DY; Jang JS; Nam KS; Lee HY
Eur Spine J; 2003 Dec; 12(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 14564558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions.
Ray CD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Mar; 22(6):667-79; discussion 679-80. PubMed ID: 9089940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.
Park Y; Ha JW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 17334287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of insufflation vs. retractional technique for laparoscopic-assisted intervertebral fusion of the lumbar spine.
Hannon JK; Faircloth WB; Lane DR; Ronderos JF; Snow LL; Weinstein LS; West JL
Surg Endosc; 2000 Mar; 14(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 10741454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes.
Blumenthal S; McAfee PC; Guyer RD; Hochschuler SH; Geisler FH; Holt RT; Garcia R; Regan JJ; Ohnmeiss DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1565-75; discussion E387-91. PubMed ID: 16025024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK.
McAfee PC; Regan JJ; Geis WP; Fedder IL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jul; 23(13):1476-84. PubMed ID: 9670400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report.
Sharma AK; Kepler CK; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Huang RC; Sama AA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 20844451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a review of outcome studies.
Inamasu J; Guiot BH
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2005 Dec; 48(6):340-7. PubMed ID: 16432783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An open, minimally invasive approach to the lumbar spine.
Dewald CJ; Millikan KW; Hammerberg KW; Doolas A; Dewald RL
Am Surg; 1999 Jan; 65(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 9915535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
