These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10065648)

  • 1. Retention force of magnets in endosteal implants used for facial prosthesis.
    Nestle B; Lukas D; Schwenzer N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 28(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10065648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Review of applying implant-magnetic attachments to oral and maxillofacial prostheses].
    Zhao Y; Liu B
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 May; 31(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 9387553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breakaway forces of flat and domed surfaced Magfit implant magnet attachments.
    Chopra V; Smith BJ; Preiskel HW; Palmer RM; Curtis R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Mar; 15(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 17378452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental analysis of retention forces of different magnetic devices for bone-anchored auricular facial prostheses.
    Voigt A; Christ S; Klein M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):664-8. PubMed ID: 18440779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positioning magnets on a multiple/sectional maxillofacial prosthesis.
    Goiato MC; Fernandes AU; dos Santos DM; Barão VA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):101-7. PubMed ID: 17994161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnet-retained facial prosthesis combined with an implant-supported edentulous maxillary obturator: a case report.
    Takahashi T; Fukuda M; Funaki K; Tanaka K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):805-7. PubMed ID: 17066645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis.
    de Sousa AA; Mattos BS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 18548962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluid force predictions and experimental measurements for a magnetically levitated pediatric ventricular assist device.
    Throckmorton AL; Untaroiu A; Lim DS; Wood HG; Allaire PE
    Artif Organs; 2007 May; 31(5):359-68. PubMed ID: 17470205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technique for magnet replacement in silicone facial prostheses.
    Lemon JC; Martin JW; Chambers MS; Wesley PJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 7722933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Magnetic retention of dental and maxillofacial prostheses].
    Voreaux P; Amans JC
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985 Sep; 39(151):609-22. PubMed ID: 3915853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.
    Mericske-Stern R; Venetz E; Fahrländer F; Bürgin W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 11105009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The United States and Swedish experience with osseointegration and facial prostheses.
    Parel SM; Tjellström A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 1843497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic drive system for a new centrifugal rotary blood pump.
    Hilton A; Tansley G
    Artif Organs; 2008 Oct; 32(10):772-7. PubMed ID: 18959665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Wahab LA; Sadig W
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 19149068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fabrication of facial prostheses by applying the osseointegration concept for retention.
    Seals RR; Cortes AL; Parel SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jun; 61(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 2724165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomical and mechanical retention in maxillofacial prosthetics.
    Cortes AL; Funk JJ
    Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1994 Nov; 11(9):33-7. PubMed ID: 7491473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Maxillofacial prostheses on endosseous implants. Various modes of fixation].
    Sabin P; Labbé D; Compère JF
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1993; 94(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 8506468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [STECO titanium magnets. A new magnetic attachment].
    Köhler S; Schmelzle R; Stemmann H
    HNO; 1994 Mar; 42(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 8175382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sectional prostheses connected by samarium-cobalt magnets.
    Sasaki H; Kinouchi Y; Tsutsui H; Yoshida Y; Karv M; Ushita T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 6389838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.