These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10067627)

  • 1. Doctor orders nurses not to "code" patient. Case on Point: Wendland v. Sparks, 574 N.W. 2d 327--IA(1998).
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1998 Apr; 38(11):2. PubMed ID: 10067627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurses followed Dr.'s DNR order on patient. Wheelock v. Doers, E2009-01968-COA-R3 TNCIV (9/14/2010)-TN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Sep; 51(4):1. PubMed ID: 20954516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure to account for 'lost' or 'missing' controlled substance. Case on point: Matthias v. Iowa Board of Nursing, 2002 WL 1429951 N.W.2d-IA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jul; 43(2):4. PubMed ID: 12189894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'Code' called contrary to pt.'s advance directives.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jan; 45(8):1. PubMed ID: 15754899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lost chance of survival case prompts consideration of ethical issues. Wendland v. Sparks.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1998 Dec; 16(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 10187270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missed DNR order.
    Austin S
    Am J Nurs; 1996 Feb; 96(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 8629700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DNR order ignored: "wrongful life" suit.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Aug; 34(3):1. PubMed ID: 8210404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'No heroic efforts' directive by parents ignored by RN.
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Feb; 39(9):4. PubMed ID: 10223028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cruel and unusual code blue?
    Baumrucker SJ; Stolick M; Morris GM; Sheldon JE; Vandekieft G
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2007; 24(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 17601850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNR case highlights ethical dilemma.
    Hartley J
    Nurs Times; 2004 Jan 20-26; 100(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 14963951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RN's expert testimony not 'required'--not 'barred'. Case on point: Davis v. Montgomery Cnty. Mem. Hosp., No. 6-086/05 (Iowa app. 07/12/2006)-IA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jul; 47(2):2. PubMed ID: 16937912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nurse refuses to follow resident's orders. Case in point: Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hosp. (438 N.W. 2d 727--MN (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Jul; 30(2):2. PubMed ID: 2762551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When R.N.'s fail to communicate: disaster. Case in point: Lambert v. Sisters of Mercy Health Corp. (369 N.W. 2d 417-IA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Aug; 26(3):2. PubMed ID: 3850612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurse disconnects respirator--code delay: abandonment. Case in point: Com. State Bd. of Nurse Examiners v. Rafferty (499 A. 2d 289--PA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Dec; 26(7):2. PubMed ID: 3853241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure to follow doctors' orders and documentation. Case in point: Hurlock v. Park Lane Medical Center (709 S.W.2d 872 - MO.).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Aug; 27(3):4. PubMed ID: 3638743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dr. fails to leave post-op. orders: nurses fail to timely call Dr. Case on point: Lupinacci v. Med. Center of Delaware, 2002 WL 31006263 N.E.2d. -DE (2002).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Sep; 43(4):2. PubMed ID: 12375397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetus born alive during abortion: Dr. orders extubation. Case in point: Hartsell v. Fort Sanders Reg. Med. Ctr. 905 S.W. 2d 944--TN (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):4. PubMed ID: 8711125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are nurses often sued as individual defendants? Case in point: Pastchol v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. 929 S.W.2d 713--AR (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Dec; 37(7):4. PubMed ID: 9256786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurses should be more involved in DNR decisions.
    Castledine G
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Feb 12-25; 13(3):175. PubMed ID: 14997080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.