These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10067627)

  • 21. Intensive care nursing: doctor problems. Case in point: Poor Sisters v. Catron (435 N.E. 2d 305 - IN).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1982 Sep; 23(4):4. PubMed ID: 6923436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. No code, slow code, "go code".
    Rosen L
    Todays Surg Nurse; 1998; 20(2):47-8. PubMed ID: 10026630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nurses as patient advocates: legal aspects. Case in point: Witt, R.N. v. Forest Hospital et al (450 N.E. 2d 811 - IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Nov; 24(6):2. PubMed ID: 6557594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nurses ignore Dr.'s orders for insulin regimen-death results. Case on point: Rush v. Senior Citizens Nursing Home District, (11/21/2006) S.W.3d -MO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Jan; 47(8):2. PubMed ID: 17310604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Insensitive nurses precipitate outrageous conduct suit. Case in point: Humana of Kentucky, Inc. v. Seitz (796 S.W. 2d 1--KY (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Dec; 31(7):2. PubMed ID: 2284416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Executing doctors' orders: nursing judgment. Case in point: Williams v. Dept. of Health (422 So. 2d 1258--LA).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Apr; 23(11):4. PubMed ID: 6551946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nurse gives nitro w/o orders: undiagnosed cardiac Pt. dies. CASE ON POINT: Michael v. Medical Staffing Network, Inc., 947 So.2d 614 -FL (2007).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Sep; 48(4):2. PubMed ID: 17941414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nurse treating AIDS patient sues: "Discovery Rule". Case in point: Casarez v. NME hospitals, Inc. 883 S.W. 2d 360--TX (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Nov; 35(6):4. PubMed ID: 7838969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When patients refuse to cooperate--nurses may be responsible! Case in point: Hackathom v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center (624 S.W.2d 472--MO (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 May; 32(12):2. PubMed ID: 1410389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Legal case briefs for nurses. IA: unattended pt. falls in bathroom: "routine nonmedicale care" standard applied; OR: nurses state "all sponges ... removed": court rejects "captain of ship" doctrine.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Nov; 34(6):3. PubMed ID: 8265796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Known allergy not on printout: nurses' duties. Case in point: Harris County Hosp. Dist. v. Estrada 872 S.W. 2d 759 TX (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jun; 35(1):2. PubMed ID: 8047644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. "Dreadful nursing care": $3 million damages awarded. Case in point: Herman v. Milwaukee Children's Hosp. (361 N.W. 2d 297 - WI).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Mar; 25(10):2. PubMed ID: 3845614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ICU nursing: incomplete medical orders. Case in point: Warren v. Canal et als (300 S.E. 2d 557 - NC).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Jun; 24(1):4. PubMed ID: 6554838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lap pad left in patient: is nurse or doctor responsible? Case in point: Ravi v. Coates 662 So. 2d 218-AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jan; 36(8):2. PubMed ID: 8711123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Polygraph tests for nurses ordered. Case in point: Marsh v. Lake Forest Hospital (519 N.E. 2d 504 (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):2. PubMed ID: 3368575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding Iowa's out-of-hospital DNR law--its benefits and its limitations.
    Freeman J
    Iowa Med; 2010; 100(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 20521744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When nurse "blows the whistle": termination. Case in point: Watassek v. Mich. Dept. of Mental Health (372 N.W.2d 617--MI).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Nov; 26(6):2. PubMed ID: 3852353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vicarious liability for nurses: "borrowed servant" doctrine. Case in point: Parker v. Hosp. Auth. of City of Bainbridge 446 S.E.2d 766--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):2. PubMed ID: 7816924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain v. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):2. PubMed ID: 7972845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electric shock for infant: disciplinary action for nurse. Case in point: Cafiero v. N.C. Board of Nursing (403 S.E. 2d 582--NC (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jun; 32(1):4. PubMed ID: 1862215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.