160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10068186)
1. Complications of brain tissue pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device.
Bekar A; Gören S; Korfali E; Aksoy K; Boyaci S
Neurosurg Rev; 1998; 21(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 10068186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device.
Bekar A; Doğan S; Abaş F; Caner B; Korfali G; Kocaeli H; Yilmazlar S; Korfali E
J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 16(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 19071023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in a 1000 cases.
Gelabert-González M; Ginesta-Galan V; Sernamito-García R; Allut AG; Bandin-Diéguez J; Rumbo RM
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Apr; 148(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 16374566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice: reliability, handling characteristics and complications.
Münch E; Weigel R; Schmiedek P; Schürer L
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1998; 140(11):1113-9; discussion 1119-20. PubMed ID: 9870055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aggressive use of ICP monitoring is safe and alters patient care.
Eddy VA; Vitsky JL; Rutherford EJ; Morris JA
Am Surg; 1995 Jan; 61(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 7832377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intracranial pressure monitoring in children: comparison of external ventricular device with the fiberoptic system.
Gambardella G; Zaccone C; Cardia E; Tomasello F
Childs Nerv Syst; 1993 Dec; 9(8):470-3. PubMed ID: 8124675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk factors of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with fiberoptic devices: a critical review.
Jensen RL; Hahn YS; Ciro E
Surg Neurol; 1997 Jan; 47(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 8986159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of percutaneous ventriculostomies and intraparenchymal monitor: a retrospective evaluation of 156 patients.
Khan SH; Kureshi IU; Mulgrew T; Ho SY; Onyiuke HC
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1998; 71():50-2. PubMed ID: 9779142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with head trauma.
Anderson RC; Kan P; Klimo P; Brockmeyer DL; Walker ML; Kestle JR
J Neurosurg; 2004 Aug; 101(1 Suppl):53-8. PubMed ID: 16206972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External Ventricular Drains versus Intraparenchymal Intracranial Pressure Monitors in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.
Liu H; Wang W; Cheng F; Yuan Q; Yang J; Hu J; Ren G
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):794-800. PubMed ID: 25541084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Placement of intracranial pressure monitors: are "normal" coagulation parameters necessary?
Davis JW; Davis IC; Bennink LD; Hysell SE; Curtis BV; Kaups KL; Bilello JF
J Trauma; 2004 Dec; 57(6):1173-7. PubMed ID: 15625446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in 303 children.
Pople IK; Muhlbauer MS; Sanford RA; Kirk E
Pediatr Neurosurg; 1995; 23(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 8555097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications following intracranial pressure monitoring in children: a 6-year single-center experience.
Ma R; Rowland D; Judge A; Calisto A; Jayamohan J; Johnson D; Richards P; Magdum S; Wall S
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2018 Mar; 21(3):278-283. PubMed ID: 29303458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fiberoptic intraparenchymal brain pressure monitoring with the Camino V420 monitor: reflections on our experience in 163 severely head-injured patients.
Poca MA; Sahuquillo J; Arribas M; Báguena M; Amorós S; Rubio E
J Neurotrauma; 2002 Apr; 19(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 11990350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Monitoring of intracranial pressure with intraparenchymal fiberoptic transducer. Technical aspects and clinical reliability].
Artru F; Terrier A; Gibert I; Messaoudi K; Charlot M; Naous H; Jourdan C
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1992; 11(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 1416275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of serial CT scanning and intracranial pressure monitoring for detecting new intracranial mass effect in severe head injury patients showing lesions type I-II in the initial CT scan].
Lobato RD; Alen JF; Perez-Nuñez A; Alday R; Gómez PA; Pascual B; Lagares A; Miranda P; Arrese I; Kaen A
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2005 Jun; 16(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 16007322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intracranial pressure monitoring: fiberoptic monitor compared with the ventricular catheter.
Schickner DJ; Young RF
Surg Neurol; 1992 Apr; 37(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 1595034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Camino intracranial pressure monitor: prospective study of accuracy and complications.
Martínez-Mañas RM; Santamarta D; de Campos JM; Ferrer E
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Jul; 69(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 10864608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring of brain tissue pressure with a fiberoptic device.
Gambardella G; d'Avella D; Tomasello F
Neurosurgery; 1992 Nov; 31(5):918-21; discussion 921-2. PubMed ID: 1436417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Management of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of a Large Level I Trauma Center in Southern Iran.
Khalili H; Sadraei N; Niakan A; Ghaffarpasand F; Sadraei A
World Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 94():120-125. PubMed ID: 27392896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
