These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10069486)
1. Development of a non-radioactive endpoint in a modified local lymph node assay. Hariya T; Hatao M; Ichikawa H Food Chem Toxicol; 1999 Jan; 37(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10069486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and utilization of an ex vivo bromodeoxyuridine local lymph node assay protocol for assessing potential chemical sensitizers. Williams WC; Copeland C; Boykin E; Quell SJ; Lehmann DM J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 24532485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. B cell increases and ex vivo IL-2 production as secondary endpoints for the detection of sensitizers in non-radioisotopic local lymph node assay using flow cytometry. Jung KM; Jang WH; Lee YK; Yum YN; Sohn S; Kim BH; Chung JH; Park YH; Lim KM Toxicol Lett; 2012 Mar; 209(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 22245253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles. Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of an ex vivo murine local lymph node assay: multiple endpoint comparison. Piccotti JR; Knight SA; Gillhouse K; Lagattuta MS; Bleavins MR J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 16705757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An improvement of LLNA:DA to assess the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. Zhang H; Shi Y; Wang C; Zhao K; Zhang S; Wei L; Dong L; Gu W; Xu Y; Ruan H; Zhi H; Yang X J Toxicol Sci; 2017; 42(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 28321039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. Basketter DA; Scholes EW Food Chem Toxicol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 1544608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of an ex vivo local lymph node assay to assess contact hypersensitivity potential. Piccotti JR; Kawabata TT J Immunotoxicol; 2008 Jul; 5(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 18830887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure. De Jong WH; Arts JH; De Klerk A; Schijf MA; Ezendam J; Kuper CF; Van Loveren H Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 19422874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The reduced local lymph node assay: the impact of group size. Ryan CA; Chaney JG; Kern PS; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA; Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 17879259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of non-radioactive endpoints of ex vivo local lymph node assay-BrdU to investigate select contact sensitizers. Ulker OC; Ates I; Atak A; Karakaya A J Immunotoxicol; 2013; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22734851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment. Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10513674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test. Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 8045461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay. Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of contact sensitivity of four thiourea rubber accelerators: comparison of two mouse lymph node assays with the guinea pig maximization test. Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Momma J; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 32(11):1067-72. PubMed ID: 7959462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of non-radio isotopic endpoint of murine local lymph node assay based on 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. Takeyoshi M; Yamasaki K; Yakabe Y; Takatsuki M; Kimber I Toxicol Lett; 2001 Mar; 119(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 11246173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of BALB/c and CBA/J mice for the local lymph node assay using bromodeoxyuridine with flow cytometry (LLNA: BrdU-FCM). Lee YS; Yi JS; Seo SJ; Kim JH; Jung MS; Seo IK; Ahn I; Ko K; Kim TS; Lim KM; Sohn S Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 83():13-22. PubMed ID: 27816673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]