These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10069486)
41. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay. Maurer T; Kimber I Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Detection of contact sensitivity of metal salts using the murine local lymph node assay. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Toxicol Lett; 1992 Aug; 62(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 1509507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site. Chipinda I; Anderson SE; Butterworth LF; Beezhold D; Siegel PD Toxicology; 2009 Mar; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes. Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay. Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Basketter DA; Lea L; Blaikie L; Dearman RJ; Warbrick EV; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 10945748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Assessment of the ear swelling test and the local lymph node assay in hamsters. Clottens FL; Breyssens A; De Raeve H; Demedts M; Nemery B J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 1996 Jun; 35(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 8782095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Performance standard-based validation study for local lymph node assay: 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine-flow cytometry method. Ahn I; Kim TS; Jung ES; Yi JS; Jang WH; Jung KM; Park M; Jung MS; Jeon EY; Yeo KU; Jo JH; Park JE; Kim CY; Park YC; Seong WK; Lee AY; Chun YJ; Jeong TC; Jeung EB; Lim KM; Bae S; Sohn S; Heo Y Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():183-94. PubMed ID: 27318101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. Kimber I; Basketter DA Food Chem Toxicol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 1555798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The local lymph node assay and potential application to the identification of drug allergens. Kimber I Toxicology; 2001 Feb; 158(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11164993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Differential gene expression responses distinguish contact and respiratory sensitizers and nonsensitizing irritants in the local lymph node assay. Adenuga D; Woolhiser MR; Gollapudi BB; Boverhof DR Toxicol Sci; 2012 Apr; 126(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 22302311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dietary vitamin A enhances sensitivity of the local lymph node assay. Sailstad DM; Krishnan SD; Tepper JS; Doerfler DL; Selgrade MK Toxicology; 1995 Feb; 96(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 7886686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Allergenicity evaluation of fragrance mix and its ingredients by using ex vivo local lymph node assay-BrdU endpoints. Ulker OC; Kaymak Y; Karakaya A Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Mar; 65():162-7. PubMed ID: 24389455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The local lymph node assay in practice: a current regulatory perspective. Cockshott A; Evans P; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA Hum Exp Toxicol; 2006 Jul; 25(7):387-94. PubMed ID: 16898167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience. Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Intracellular expression of cytokines and granzyme B in auricular lymph nodes draining skin exposed to irritants and sensitizers. Ku HO; Jeong SH; Kang HG; Pyo HM; Cho JH; Son SW; Kim HR; Lee KJ; Ryu DY Toxicology; 2008 Sep; 250(2-3):116-23. PubMed ID: 18652873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Allergenicity evaluation of p-chloro-m-cresol and p-chloro-m-xylenol by non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay and multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test. Yamano T; Shimizu M; Noda T Toxicology; 2003 Aug; 190(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12927380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Optimization of an in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay for predictive assessment of immunologic responsiveness to contact sensitizers. Robinson MK J Invest Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 92(6):860-7. PubMed ID: 2723450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Improved ex vivo/in vitro lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for a screening test of contact hypersensitivity of chemical compounds. Kashima R; Oyake Y; Okada J; Ikeda Y Toxicology; 1996 Nov; 114(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8931760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]