These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10069620)

  • 1. Attentional stimuli and programming hand selection: a developmental perspective.
    Gabbard C; Rabb C; Gentry V
    Int J Neurosci; 1998 Dec; 96(3-4):205-15. PubMed ID: 10069620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace?
    Gabbard C; Helbig CR
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 14745465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements?
    Gabbard C; Rabb C
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Apr; 127(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 10843260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional effects on reaching in hemispace.
    Rabb C; Gabbard C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):701-2. PubMed ID: 10483666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateralized effects on reaching by children.
    Gabbard C; Helbig CR; Gentry V
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2001; 19(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 11411421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.
    Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Mar; 48(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 16489592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What determines limb selection for reaching?
    Helbig CR; Gabbard C
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2004 Mar; 75(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 15532361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imagined and actual limb selection: a test of preference.
    Gabbard C; Rabb C
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):139-44. PubMed ID: 11527314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention.
    Roth HL; Lora AN; Heilman KM
    Brain; 2002 Sep; 125(Pt 9):2023-35. PubMed ID: 12183348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left-side infant holding: a test of the hemispheric arousal-attentional hypothesis.
    Harris LJ; Almerigi JB; Carbary TJ; Fogel TG
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):159-65. PubMed ID: 11527318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hand and hemispace effects in tactual tasks in children.
    Burden V; Bradshaw JL; Nettleton NC; Wilson L
    Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(4):515-25. PubMed ID: 4033905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of competition and motor reprogramming on visuomotor selection in unilateral neglect.
    Mattingley JB; Corben LA; Bradshaw JL; Bradshaw JA; Phillips JG; Horne MK
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 May; 120(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 9629966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A developmental analysis of the relationship between hand preference and performance: I. Preferential reaching into hemispace.
    Pryde KM; Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):370-4. PubMed ID: 10857728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric differences in attentional orienting by social cues.
    Greene DJ; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21093465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Right visual field attentional bias in reading in children and adults.
    Riva M; Siéroff E
    Behav Neurol; 2010; 23(4):199-201. PubMed ID: 21422554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage.
    Mattingley JB; Driver J; Beschin N; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Jun; 35(6):867-80. PubMed ID: 9204491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual field asymmetries in object individuation.
    Harris IM; Wong C; Andrews S
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():194-206. PubMed ID: 26433638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right-handers' reaching in contralateral hemispace: a kinematic observation.
    Kim W; Gabbard C; Buchanan JJ; Ryu YU
    J Mot Behav; 2007 Nov; 39(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 18055351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual asymmetry for chimeric stimuli in children with early unilateral brain damage.
    Bava S; Ballantyne AO; May SJ; Trauner DA
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Oct; 59(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16198818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness.
    Railo H; Tallus J; Hämäläinen H
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 21962763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.