These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10069728)

  • 1. Intra- and interoperator variations in region-of-interest drawing and their effect on the measurement of glomerular filtration rates.
    White DR; Houston AS; Sampson WF; Wilkins GP
    Clin Nucl Med; 1999 Mar; 24(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 10069728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of region of interest selection and uptake measurement on glomerular filtration rate measured by 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy in dogs.
    Kampa N; Wennstrom U; Lord P; Twardock R; Maripuu E; Eksell P; Fredriksson SO
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2002; 43(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 12175004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deep regression using
    Pi Y; Zhao Z; Yang P; Cheng J; Jiang L; Wei J; Chen X; Cai H; Yi Z
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 35796790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of renal function with 99mTc-MAG3 using semiautomated regions of interest.
    Inoue Y; Yoshikawa K; Yoshioka N; Watanabe T; Saegusa S; Kaneko Y; Yokoyama I; Ohtomo K
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Dec; 41(12):1947-54. PubMed ID: 11138677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fully automatic region of interest selection in glomerular filtration rate estimation from 99mTc-DTPA renogram.
    Lin KJ; Huang JY; Chen YS
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Dec; 24(6):1010-23. PubMed ID: 21274591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of observer variability on glomerular filtration rate measurement by renal scintigraphy in dogs.
    Kampa N; Lord P; Maripuu E
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2006; 47(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 16553156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Development of automatic analysis for dynamic renal function study using computed tomographic (CT) images].
    Ikematsu R; Kawata H; Kawamura S; Miura H; Miyagawa T; Ishibashi M; Hayabuchi N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Dec; 63(12):1377-81. PubMed ID: 18310998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subtraction of extra-renal background in 99mTc-DTPA renography: comparison of various regions of interest.
    Moonen M; Granerus G
    Clin Physiol; 1992 Jul; 12(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 1505167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semiautomated renal region-of-interest selection method: validation in a dog model.
    Hornof WJ; Cowgill LD; Conrad GR; Fisher P
    Am J Physiol Imaging; 1988; 3(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 3056464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new quantitative method for estimating glomerular filtration rate and its clinical value.
    Cheng MH; Zeng FW; Xie LJ; Li JF; Zhang F; Jiang H
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Mar; 36(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 25412856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated Region of Interest Detection Method in Scintigraphic Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation.
    Zheng X; Wei W; Huang Q; Song S; Huang G
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 Mar; 23(2):787-794. PubMed ID: 29994233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Renal depth estimates to improve the accuracy of glomerular filtration rate.
    Steinmetz AP; Zwas ST; Macadziob S; Rotemberg G; Shrem Y
    J Nucl Med; 1998 Oct; 39(10):1822-5. PubMed ID: 9776296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of quantitative renographic parameters of differential function and renal drainage in children.
    Tondeur M; Nogarède C; Donoso G; Piepsz A
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2013 Aug; 73(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 23819645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A semi-automated region of interest detection method in the scintigraphic glomerular filtration rate determination for patients with abnormal low renal function.
    Tian C; Zheng X; Han Y; Sun X; Chen K; Huang Q
    Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Nov; 38(11):855-62. PubMed ID: 24096995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Background correction in estimating initial renal uptake. Comparison between Tc-99m MAG3 and Tc-99m DTPA.
    Inoue Y; Machida K; Honda N; Takahashi T; Mamiya T
    Clin Nucl Med; 1994 Dec; 19(12):1049-54. PubMed ID: 7874800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of six radionuclidic and non-radionuclidic methods for the assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic renal failure].
    Fotopoulos A; Bokharhli JA; Tsiouris S; Katsaraki A; Papadopoulos A; Tsironi M; Theodorou J
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 16894423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation of renal function by tumor and its effect on the calculated glomerular filtration rate.
    Boxen I
    Clin Nucl Med; 1999 May; 24(5):338-42. PubMed ID: 10232473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semi-automated renal region of interest selection method using the double-threshold technique: inter-operator variability in quantitating 99mTc-MAG3 renal uptake.
    Tomaru Y; Inoue T; Oriuchi N; Takahashi K; Endo K
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Jan; 25(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9396875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radionuclide staging of renal function in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    Rajic M; Ilic S; Vlajkovic M; Antic S; Velickovic L; Stefanovic V
    Ren Fail; 2007; 29(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17763163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The natural history of postoperative renal function in patients undergoing ileal conduit diversion for cancer measured using serial isotopic glomerular filtration rate and 99m technetium-mercaptoacetyltriglycine renography.
    Samuel JD; Bhatt RI; Montague RJ; Clarke NW; Ramani VA
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2518-22; discussion 2522. PubMed ID: 17085147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.