208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10069933)
1. "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.
Metz CE; Pan X
J Math Psychol; 1999 Mar; 43(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 10069933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
Pan X; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves.
Pesce LL; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):814-29. PubMed ID: 17574132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.
Pesce LL; Horsch K; Drukker K; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1537-48. PubMed ID: 22055797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Constructing "proper" ROCs from ordinal response data using weighted power functions.
Mossman D; Peng H
Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):523-35. PubMed ID: 24029820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):438-47. PubMed ID: 10845403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.
Metz CE; Herman BA; Shen JH
Stat Med; 1998 May; 17(9):1033-53. PubMed ID: 9612889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create "Proper" ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data.
Mossman D; Peng H
Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):349-65. PubMed ID: 25911601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Metz CE; Lenth RV; Hanley JA; Abu Dagga H
Acad Radiol; 1997 Feb; 4(2):138-49. PubMed ID: 9061087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of two priors on Bayesian estimation of "Proper" binormal ROC curves from common and degenerate datasets.
Zur RM; Pesce LL; Jiang Y
Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):969-79. PubMed ID: 20605491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limitations to the robustness of binormal ROC curves: effects of model misspecification and location of decision thresholds on bias, precision, size and power.
Walsh SJ
Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 9131755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonparametric estimation of degenerate ROC data sets used for comparison of imaging systems.
Rockette HE; Obuchowski NA; Gur D
Invest Radiol; 1990 Jul; 25(7):835-7. PubMed ID: 2391200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ROC Curve for Extremely Subtle Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs Confirmed by CT Scan.
Shang H; Jiang Y; Li F; MacMahon H; Wang J
Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26774737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model.
Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jun; 7(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 10845402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hanley JA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The robustness of the "binormal" assumptions used in fitting ROC curves.
Hanley JA
Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 3398748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
