These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10070200)

  • 21. Reaction time drifts identify objects of attention in pigeon visual search.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Apr; 19(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 8505592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons.
    Wolfe JM; Butcher SJ; Lee C; Hyle M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):483-502. PubMed ID: 12760630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Goal-driven modulation as a function of time in saccadic target selection.
    van Zoest W; Donk M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1553-72. PubMed ID: 17926227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
    Lavie N; Torralbo A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.
    Turatto M; Galfano G
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):286-97. PubMed ID: 11281103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of the irrelevant: the task environment modulates the impact of irrelevant features in response selection.
    Mast F; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2198-213. PubMed ID: 25328998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus-determined discrimination mechanisms for color search.
    Olds ES; Cowan WB; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1038-45. PubMed ID: 10497425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.
    Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 16724780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing.
    Whiting WL; Madden DJ; Babcock KJ
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 17563178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction.
    Wolfe JM
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 11414127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention in visual search: multiple search classes.
    Cheal M; Lyon DR
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Aug; 52(2):113-38. PubMed ID: 1508619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
    Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?
    Chang S; Egeth HE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):260-269. PubMed ID: 33241528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the role of top-down and bottom-up guidance in conjunction search: Singleton interference revisited.
    Dent K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1784-1810. PubMed ID: 37017865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt A):74-83. PubMed ID: 27756581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.