These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10070636)
1. Selecting subjects for participation in clinical research: one sphere of justice. Weijer C J Med Ethics; 1999 Feb; 25(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10070636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The NIH inclusion guidelines: challenges for the future. Rothenberg KH; Hayunga EG; Rudick JE; Pinn VW IRB; 1996; 18(3):1-4, 12. PubMed ID: 11654407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials. Weijer C IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed regulations for research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: a consideration of their relevance in 1995. Levine RJ Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 11654513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. IRBs: protecting the well-being of subject-participants with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. Baylis F Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):183-99. PubMed ID: 11658175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomedical experimentation on the mentally handicapped: ethical and legal dilemmas. Baudouin JL Med Law; 1990; 9(4):1052-61. PubMed ID: 2125103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Institute of Medicine's report on women and health research: implications for IRBs and the research community. Rothenberg KH IRB; 1996; 18(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. True protection for persons with severe mental disabilities, such as schizophrenia, involved as subjects in research? A look and consideration of the "Protection of Human Subjects. Ryan AJ J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(2):349-76. PubMed ID: 11657417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Vulnerability: reflection on its ethical implications for the protection of participants in SAMHSA programs. McGovern TF Ethics Behav; 1998; 8(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 11660539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Sacred" research practices we may want to change. Howe EG J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 10633278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An introduction to NBAC's report on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. Childress JF Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):101-15. PubMed ID: 11658169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When should "riskier" subjects be excluded from research participation? Wendler D Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Sep; 8(3):307-27. PubMed ID: 11656935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The new NIH and FDA medical research policies: targeting gender, promoting justice. Baird KL J Health Polit Policy Law; 1999 Jun; 24(3):531-65. PubMed ID: 10386326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in the social control of medical and psychiatric research. Benson PR; Roth LH Law Ment Health; 1988; 4():1-47. PubMed ID: 11655151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Justice and the inclusion of women in clinical studies: an argument for further reform. DeBruin DA Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Jun; 4(2):117-46. PubMed ID: 10134749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women and health research: working for change. Baylis F J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 8981194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Principlism and the ethical appraisal of clinical trials. Meslin EM; Sutherland HJ; Lavery JV; Till JE Bioethics; 1995 Oct; 9(5):399-418. PubMed ID: 11653257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of human subjects. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Code Fed Regul Public Welfare; 1995 Oct; Title 45(Sections 46-101 to 46-409):. PubMed ID: 11686173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. For her own good: protecting (and neglecting) women in research. Shuster E Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(3):346-61. PubMed ID: 8862822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]