These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10070641)
1. Best interests in persistent vegetative state. Fenwick AJ J Med Ethics; 1999 Feb; 25(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 10070641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Causing death or allowing to die? A rejoinder to Randall's comments. Ferguson PR J Med Ethics; 1998 Aug; 24(4):281-2. PubMed ID: 9752635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Applying best interests to persistent vegetative state--a principled distortion? Fenwick AJ J Med Ethics; 1998 Apr; 24(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 9602994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding life-sustaining treatment: the ultimate decision. Stone J New Law J; 1994 Feb; 144(6635):205-6. PubMed ID: 11652805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Courting euthanasia?: Tony Bland and the Law Lords. Keown J Ethics Med; 1993; 9(3):34-7. PubMed ID: 11652743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Persistent vegetative state, withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, and the patient's "best interests". Gillon R J Med Ethics; 1998 Apr; 24(2):75-6. PubMed ID: 9602991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Incompetent patient in PVS: views of relatives and "best interests": Re G. Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11656729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dangers of the Bland decision. Cole AP; Duddington JG Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Feb; No. 85():2. PubMed ID: 11652203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Withdrawing medical treatment: implications of the Bland case. Tribe D; Korgaonkar G Br J Hosp Med; 1992 Dec 2-1993 Jan 5; 48(11):754-6. PubMed ID: 1467821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bland: crossing the Rubicon? Finnis JM Law Q Rev; 1993 Jul; 109():329-37. PubMed ID: 11652844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Doctors as gods. Dyer C BMJ; 1999 Jul; 319(7201):64. PubMed ID: 10390489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rights of the terminally ill patient. Hodgson J Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):169-91. PubMed ID: 10164517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should organs from patients in permanent vegetative state be used for transplantation? International Forum for Transplant Ethics. Hoffenberg R; Lock M; Tilney N; Casabona C; Daar AS; Guttmann RD; Kennedy I; Nundy S; Radcliffe-Richards J; Sells RA Lancet; 1997 Nov; 350(9087):1320-1. PubMed ID: 9357422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical issues in diagnosis and management of patients in the permanent vegetative state. Wade DT BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7282):352-4. PubMed ID: 11159664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. End-of-life decisions and the law. McLean S J Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; 22(5):261-2. PubMed ID: 8910775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland. Great Britain. House of Lords All Engl Law Rep; 1993 Feb; [1993]1():821-96. PubMed ID: 11648606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The persistence of mind. Lancet; 1996 Jul; 348(9020):69. PubMed ID: 8676713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Why causing death is not necessarily morally equivalent to allowing to die--a response to Ferguson. Randall F J Med Ethics; 1997 Dec; 23(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 9499018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]