These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10070686)

  • 1. Probabilistic analysis of global performances of diagnostic tests: interpreting the Lorenz curve-based summary measures.
    Lee WC
    Stat Med; 1999 Feb; 18(4):455-71. PubMed ID: 10070686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative summary indices for the receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Lee WC; Hsiao CK
    Epidemiology; 1996 Nov; 7(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 8899386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ROC Curve for Extremely Subtle Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs Confirmed by CT Scan.
    Shang H; Jiang Y; Li F; MacMahon H; Wang J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26774737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The area under an ROC curve with limited information.
    van den Hout WB
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 12693878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests - Part 2 [Pre-test and post-test probability and odds, Likelihood ratios, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, Youden's Index and Diagnostic test biases].
    Gogtay NJ
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2017 Jul; 65(7):86-91. PubMed ID: 28792173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 9871953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
    Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the use of partial area under the ROC curve for comparison of two diagnostic tests.
    Ma H; Bandos AI; Gur D
    Biom J; 2015 Mar; 57(2):304-20. PubMed ID: 25537143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing an underlying assumption on a ROC curve based on rating data.
    Zhou XH
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 7564941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visualising exposure-disease association: the Lorenz curve and the Gini index.
    Llorca J; Delgado-Rodríguez M
    Med Sci Monit; 2002 Oct; 8(10):MT193-7. PubMed ID: 12388928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnostic accuracy].
    Simundić AM
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The walking man approach to interpreting the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Kohn MA; Newman TB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 162():182-186. PubMed ID: 37562728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summary measure of discrimination in survival models based on cumulative/dynamic time-dependent ROC curves.
    Lambert J; Chevret S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2088-2102. PubMed ID: 24395866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative performance measures for prediction models.
    Wu YC; Lee WC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91249. PubMed ID: 24608868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a gold standard.
    Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Utts JM; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2090-106. PubMed ID: 20603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marker selection via maximizing the partial area under the ROC curve of linear risk scores.
    Wang Z; Chang YC
    Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):369-85. PubMed ID: 20729218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model.
    Zhang D; Zhang B
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting diagnostic tests for ruling out or ruling in disease: the use of the Kullback-Leibler distance.
    Lee WC
    Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 28(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 10405859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.