These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10070792)

  • 1. A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG.
    Huang MX; Mosher JC; Leahy RM
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):423-40. PubMed ID: 10070792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography.
    Stenroos M; Hunold A; Haueisen J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():337-348. PubMed ID: 24434678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapidly recomputable EEG forward models for realistic head shapes.
    Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leah RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1265-81. PubMed ID: 11324964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG.
    Crouzeix A; Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2176-88. PubMed ID: 10616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Wagner M; Hawes S; Ebersole JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 113(5):702-12. PubMed ID: 11976050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Volume currents in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Weinstein D; Johnson C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12572653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of multiple-sphere head models for MEG source localization.
    Lalancette M; Quraan M; Cheyne D
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5621-35. PubMed ID: 21828900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling.
    Fuchs M; Drenckhahn R; Wischmann HA; Wagner M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Aug; 45(8):980-97. PubMed ID: 9691573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of head modeling errors on the spatial frequency representation of MEG.
    Yeo WJ; Larson E; Iivanainen J; Borna A; McKay J; Stephen JM; Schwindt PDD; Taulu S
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 37040782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed.
    Stenroos M; Sarvas J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3517-35. PubMed ID: 22581305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Realistic three-layer head phantom for optically pumped magnetometer-based magnetoencephalography.
    Cao F; Gao Z; Qi S; Chen K; Xiang M; An N; Ning X
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 164():107318. PubMed ID: 37595517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Error analysis of a Galerkin method to solve the forward problem in MEG using the boundary element method.
    Tissari S; Rahola J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Nov; 72(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 14554135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generalized head models for MEG/EEG: boundary element method beyond nested volumes.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1333-46. PubMed ID: 16481698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Functional imaging of the brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG)].
    Huk WJ; Vieth J
    Radiologe; 1993 Nov; 33(11):633-8. PubMed ID: 8278590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of head modeling and sensor types in localizing human gamma-band oscillations.
    Mideksa KG; Hoogenboom N; Hellriegel H; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():2217-20. PubMed ID: 25570427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.