BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 100721)

  • 1. Decision theory in medicine: a review and critique.
    Albert DA
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1978; 56(3):362-401. PubMed ID: 100721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The precautionary principle: advantages and risks].
    Tubiana M
    J Chir (Paris); 2001 Apr; 138(2):68-80. PubMed ID: 11319454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health impact assessment of agriculture and food policies: lessons learnt from the Republic of Slovenia.
    Lock K; Gabrijelcic-Blenkus M; Martuzzi M; Otorepec P; Wallace P; Dora C; Robertson A; Zakotnic JM
    Bull World Health Organ; 2003; 81(6):391-8. PubMed ID: 12894321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical use of decision analysis.
    Lawler FH
    Prim Care; 1995 Jun; 22(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 7617787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using simulation in decision making.
    Boxerman SB; Serota SP
    Hosp Prog; 1979 Jul; 60(7):72-5. PubMed ID: 447317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of clinical decision making: models and current research.
    Banning M
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jan; 17(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 17331095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic aspects of clinical decision making: applications of clinical decision analysis.
    Crane VS
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Mar; 45(3):548-53. PubMed ID: 3285672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic issues in the development and use of practice guidelines: an application to resource allocation in dentistry.
    Birch S; Leake JL; Lewis DW
    Community Dent Health; 1996 Jun; 13(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 8763135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision making the explicit evidence-based way: comparing benefits, harms and costs.
    McArthur J; Dickinson A
    Nurs Prax N Z; 1999 Mar; 14(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 10481662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A model for service delivery research and evaluation: management implications for alcohol, drug abuse and mental health organizations.
    Gregory D; Rundell OH
    Curr Alcohol; 1981; 8():119-36. PubMed ID: 6282541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the origins and development of evidence-based medicine and medical decision making.
    Elstein AS
    Inflamm Res; 2004 Aug; 53 Suppl 2():S184-9. PubMed ID: 15338074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linking evidence from health technology assessments to policy and decision making: the Alberta model.
    Borowski HZ; Brehaut J; Hailey D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 17493300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physicians as gatekeepers: illness certification as a rationing device.
    Stone DA
    Public Policy; 1979; 27(2):227-54. PubMed ID: 10242343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technology in medicine -- ethics, politics and reality.
    Watts JL; Blanchard R; Guyatt G; Miller D; Singer P; Haynes RB; Van Loon R
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1992 Feb; 25(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 11653977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation and decision making. The economist's point of view (author's transl)].
    Griffiths A
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1981; 29(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 6795692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision science and cervical cancer.
    Cantor SB; Fahs MC; Mandelblatt JS; Myers ER; Sanders GD
    Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9 Suppl):2003-8. PubMed ID: 14603536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].
    Tubiana M
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2000; 184(5):969-93. PubMed ID: 11077719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.