65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10073089)
1. [Coronary angioplasty: always a stent in arteries larger than 2.5 mm? The arguments con].
Goicolea Ruigómez FJ; Macaya Miguel C
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 52(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 10073089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of coronary artery stents on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a strategy of routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty.
Al Suwaidi J; Holmes DR; Salam AM; Lennon R; Berger PB
Am Heart J; 2004 May; 147(5):815-22. PubMed ID: 15131536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical economic considerations of coronary stenting.
Szucs TD
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1999 Nov; 129(45):1701-11. PubMed ID: 10595380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety of direct stenting in coronary angioplasty.
Taylor AJ; Broughton A; Federman J; Walton A; Keighley C; Haikerwal D; Krawczyszyn M; Shaw J; Goods C
J Invasive Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 12(11):560-5. PubMed ID: 11060569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience.
Reynolds MR; Neil N; Ho KK; Berezin R; Cosgrove RS; Lager RA; Sirois C; Johnson RG; Cohen DJ
Am Heart J; 2003 Feb; 145(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 12595853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic outcomes analysis of stenting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for patients with coronary artery disease in Japan.
Ikeda S; Bosch J; Banz K; Schneller P
J Invasive Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 12(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 10785672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial of stenting with or without balloon predilation for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Kovar LI; Monrad ES; Sherman W; Kunchithapatham S; Ravi KL; Gotsis W; Silverman G; Brown DL
Am Heart J; 2001 Nov; 142(5):E9. PubMed ID: 11685184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Coronary angioplasty in elderly patients].
Liistro F; Colombo A
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2002 Jan; 3(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11899566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shifting the balance: direct stenting a novel approach to improve the cost effectiveness of intra-coronary stenting.
Cotton JM; Kearney MT; Wainwright RJ
Eur Heart J; 2000 Jan; 21(2):170. PubMed ID: 10637091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Economics and outcomes of coronary stenting: are stents right for everybody?
Weintraub WS
J Invasive Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 12(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 10785673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is bare-metal stenting superior to balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease? Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Agostoni P; Biondi-Zoccai GG; Gasparini GL; Anselmi M; Morando G; Turri M; Abbate A; McFadden EP; Vassanelli C; Zardini P; Colombo A; Serruys PW
Eur Heart J; 2005 May; 26(9):881-9. PubMed ID: 15681573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes.
Ijsselmuiden AJ; Tangelder GJ; Cotton JM; Vaijifdar B; Kiemeneij F; Slagboom T; v d Wieken R; Serruys PW; Laarman GJ
Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2003; 5(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 12959731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of primary balloon angioplasty with bailout stenting strategy to primary coronary stenting strategy in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Tajstra M; Gasior M; Lekston A; Wilczek K; Hawranek M; Gierlotka M; Słonka G; Zebik T; Poloński L
Kardiol Pol; 2007 Nov; 65(11):1277-84; discussion 1285-6. PubMed ID: 18058578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronary stenting: costly or cost-effective?
Cohen DJ; Baim DS
J Invasive Cardiol; 1995; 7 Suppl A():36A-42A. PubMed ID: 10155115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical outcome in patients after single vessel PTCA with multiple stent implantation].
Pieniazek P; Przewłocki T; Zmudka K; Dudek D; Sedziwy E; Olszowska M; Kostkiewicz M; Kapelak B; Tracz W
Przegl Lek; 2001; 58(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 11816735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of true bifurcation stenosis by elective stent implantation in parent vessel and non-stent dilatation of side branch: immediate and follow-up results.
Gambhir DS; Singh S; Sinha SC; Nair GM; Arora R
Indian Heart J; 2000; 52(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 10976149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified T-stenting with intentional protrusion of the side-branch stent within the main vessel stent to ensure ostial coverage and facilitate final kissing balloon: the T-stenting and small protrusion technique (TAP-stenting). Report of bench testing and first clinical Italian-Korean two-centre experience.
Burzotta F; Gwon HC; Hahn JY; Romagnoli E; Choi JH; Trani C; Colombo A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jul; 70(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 17585382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic impact on physicians and hospitals of proposed changes in Medicare reimbursement for coronary interventions.
Vaitkus PT
Am Heart J; 1999 Feb; 137(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 9924159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study.
Alfonso F; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Hernández R; Bethencourt A; Martí V; López-Mínguez JR; Angel J; Iñiguez A; Morís C; Cequier A; Sabaté M; Escaned J; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Bañuelos C; Suárez A; Macaya C;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(20):1621-7. PubMed ID: 18992651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical benefit of small vessel stenting: one-year follow-up of the SISCA trial.
Moer R; Myreng Y; Mølstad P; Albertsson P; Gunnes P; Lindvall B; Wiseth R; Arne KY; Golf S
Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 Mar; 36(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 12028870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
