159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10074764)
1. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better?
Chee W; Felton DA; Johnson PF; Sullivan DY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 10074764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained multiunit implant restoration.
Uludag B; Celik G
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 17069169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrievable cemented crown options on implant-supported angled abutments: a case report.
Ganor Y; Indig B; Gross M
Quintessence Int; 1996 Oct; 27(10):679-84. PubMed ID: 9180404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments.
Keith SE; Miller BH; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 10379110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Restoration of the single stage non-submerged dental implant.
Higginbottom FL
J Calif Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 23(3):65-6, 68, 70 passim. PubMed ID: 7673997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple, permanent index for abutment screw access for cemented implant-supported crowns.
Hill EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):313-4. PubMed ID: 17547952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Early loading of ITI implants supporting maxillary fixed full-arch prostheses.
Lai HC; Zhang ZY; Zhuang LF; Wang F; Liu X; Pu YP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1129-34. PubMed ID: 18983315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prosthodontic solutions for compromised implant placement.
Zinner ID; Panno FV; Abrahamson BD; Small SA
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 8397696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eliminating microgaps: the PerioSeal Implant System. Interview.
Callan DP
Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Nov; 13(11):81-6. PubMed ID: 12510257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What's your choice: cement- or screw-retained implant restorations?
Strong SM
Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18254555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8-year experience in private practice.
Nedir R; Bischof M; Szmukler-Moncler S; Belser UC; Samson J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):919-28. PubMed ID: 17190302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design.
Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14982360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Spline implant interface: analysis and initial clinical experiences.
Dario LJ
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1998 Sep; 19(9):896-8, 900, 902 passim. PubMed ID: 9852802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cantilever fixed prostheses utilizing dental implants: a 10-year retrospective analysis.
Becker CM
Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 15202588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The implant-supported telescopic prosthesis: a biomechanical analysis.
Lindström H; Preiskel H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11280360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
