These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10076988)

  • 1. New low-contrast resolution phantoms for computed tomography.
    Suess C; Kalender WA; Coman JM
    Med Phys; 1999 Feb; 26(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 10076988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 100 days with scans of the same Catphan phantom on the same CT scanner.
    Husby E; Svendsen ED; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):224-231. PubMed ID: 28921910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to measure CT image quality: variations in CT-numbers, uniformity and low contrast resolution for a CT quality assurance phantom.
    Gulliksrud K; Stokke C; Martinsen AC
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):521-6. PubMed ID: 24530005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
    Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel Materials for Low-Contrast Phantoms for Computed Tomography.
    Allert KD; Vangala S; Dibianca FA
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2007; 15(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 17710119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and performance evaluation of an experimental fine pitch detector multislice CT scanner.
    Imai Y; Nukui M; Ishihara Y; Fujishige T; Ogata K; Moritake M; Kurochi H; Ogata T; Yahata M; Tang X
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1120-7. PubMed ID: 19472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can different Catphan phantoms be used in a multi-centre audit of radiotherapy CT image quality?
    Davis AT; Palmer AL; Nisbet A
    Phys Med; 2020 Oct; 78():38-47. PubMed ID: 32942195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and performance characteristics of a digital flat-panel computed tomography system.
    Ross W; Cody DD; Hazle JD
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1888-901. PubMed ID: 16872096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
    Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Method and phantom to study combined effects of in-plane (x,y) and z-axis resolution for 3D CT imaging.
    Goodenough D; Levy J; Kristinsson S; Fredriksson J; Olafsdottir H; Healy A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):440-452. PubMed ID: 27685130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer.
    Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J; Calzado A; Veldkamp WJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38 Suppl 1():S25. PubMed ID: 21978115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flat panel detector-based cone beam computed tomography with a circle-plus-two-arcs data acquisition orbit: preliminary phantom study.
    Ning R; Tang X; Conover D; Yu R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1694-705. PubMed ID: 12906186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
    Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
    Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.
    Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3767-80. PubMed ID: 17089842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phantom studies for possible dose reduction in CT head procedures.
    Staniszewska MA; Obrzut M; Rybka K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):326-31. PubMed ID: 15933131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.