These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10077252)

  • 1. Variable-speech-rate audiometry for hearing aid evaluation.
    Hosoi H; Tsuta Y; Nishida T; Murata K; Ohta F; Mekata T; Kato Y
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1999 Jan; 26(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 10077252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New speech tests reveal benefit of wide-dynamic-range, fast-acting compression for consonant discrimination in children with moderate-to-profound hearing loss.
    Marriage JE; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):418-25. PubMed ID: 14582638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical design and evaluation of the prototype of a new digital audioprosthesis for profound hearing loss: speech recognition aspects.
    Urquiza R; Ruiz-Rico R; Tejero C; Gago A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 10325552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification.
    Magnusson L; Karlsson M; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].
    Müller A; Hocke T; Hoppe U; Mir-Salim P
    HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 26801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram.
    Ito A; Fukuda S; Shimozawa M; Abe K; Kumada J; Nakaya M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Feb; 50(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 35643884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rehabilitative procedures in sensorineural hearing loss. Studies on the routine used.
    Lundborg T; Risberg A; Holmqvist C; Lindström B; Svärd I
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 7178816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of orthogonal polynomial compression.
    Levitt H; Neuman AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):241-52. PubMed ID: 1880295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of speech audiometry in hearing-aid rehabilitation.
    Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 1842284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of the audiological outcomes with Retro-X (semi-implantable hearing aid system) and conventional open fitting hearing aids.
    Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Stieve M; Winter M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1189-94. PubMed ID: 18365229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvements in speech perception with use of the AVR TranSonic frequency-transposing hearing aid.
    McDermott HJ; Dorkos VP; Dean MR; Ching TY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1323-35. PubMed ID: 10599615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of performance with frequency transposition hearing aids and conventional hearing aids.
    Parent TC; Chmiel R; Jerger J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Feb; 9(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 9493944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech discrimination tests with hearing aids in tele-coil listening mode. A comparative study in school children.
    Pettersson E
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3589475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.