These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10078518)
1. US stalls on new definitions of misconduct. Dalton R Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):16. PubMed ID: 10078518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct. Hackett EJ J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining research misconduct: will we know it when we see it? Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 11478122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint. Price AR J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research fraud and public policy. Kennedy D Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5618):393. PubMed ID: 12702843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research fraud, public policy, and gun control. Lott JR Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5625):1505; author reply 1505. PubMed ID: 12791965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed. Teitelbaum SL Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Crime scene investigation: how to handle misconduct. Marshall E Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5779):1465. PubMed ID: 16763128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits. Korn D Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expressing a consensus on candour. Guenin LM Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):577-8. PubMed ID: 10604459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct. Wadman M Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. More questions about research misconduct. Kennedy D Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5578):13. PubMed ID: 12098673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What should the standard of proof be in scientific misconduct proceedings relating to public health service-funded research? Spece RG; Marchalonis J Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2003 Jun; 49(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 12899448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shattuck Lecture--misconduct in medical research. Dingell JD N Engl J Med; 1993 Jun; 328(22):1610-5. PubMed ID: 8487803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal actions against plagiarism in research. Price AR J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Scientific fraud and misconduct--need for comprehensive terminology]. Riis P; Nylenna M; Dahlquist G; Sarvas M Nord Med; 1998 Dec; 113(10):358-9. PubMed ID: 9925461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Falsifying data is main problem in US research fraud review. Pownall M West J Med; 1999 Jun; 170(6):377. PubMed ID: 10443168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]