These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10079488)

  • 1. Clinical interpretation of ultrasound biometry for dating and for assessment of fetal growth using a wheel and chart: is it sufficiently accurate?
    Hutchon DJ; Kearney C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 13(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 10079488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Circle of time: errors in the use of the pregnancy wheel.
    Ross MG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Dec; 14(6):370-2. PubMed ID: 15061314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal biometry at 4300 m compared to sea level in Peru.
    Krampl E; Lees C; Bland JM; Espinoza Dorado J; Moscoso G; Campbell S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 16(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 11084959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Construction of modern Australian first trimester ultrasound dating and growth charts.
    McLennan AC; Schluter PJ
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Oct; 52(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 19032393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'Expert' analysis of menstrual and ultrasound data in pregnancy--gestational dating.
    Hutchon DJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Sep; 18(5):435-8. PubMed ID: 15512138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal growth is directly related to maternal anthropometry and placental volume.
    Thame M; Osmond C; Bennett F; Wilks R; Forrester T
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Jun; 58(6):894-900. PubMed ID: 15164110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A proposed protocol for obstetrical ultrasound examination].
    Novakov A; Vejnović T; Stojić S; Belopavlović Z
    Med Pregl; 1999; 52(9-10):351-6. PubMed ID: 10624383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Determination of the expected day of delivery--ultrasound has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method].
    Olsen O; Clausen JA
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Mar; 160(14):2088-90. PubMed ID: 9604677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal biometry: a comparison of family physicians and radiologists.
    Keith R; Frisch L
    Fam Med; 2001 Feb; 33(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 11271737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 17444561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation.
    Schwärzler P; Bland JM; Holden D; Campbell S; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 14970994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Dorion A; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ultrasound foetal biometry in the town of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Report of a cohort of 126 pregnant women].
    Cissé R; Ouédraogo A; Tapsoba T; Lougué C; Ouédraogo CM; Ouattara T; Lankoandé J; Koné B
    J Radiol; 2000 May; 81(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 10804399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ultrasonographic fetal biometry charts in Niger].
    Vangeenderhuysen C; Nono M
    Med Trop (Mars); 1998; 58(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 10399699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome.
    Pedersen NG; Figueras F; Wøjdemann KR; Tabor A; Gardosi J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 18827118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
    Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can ultrasound fetal biometry predict fetal hyperinsulinaemia at delivery in pregnancy complicated by maternal diabetes?
    Farrell T; Owen P; Kernaghan D; Ola B; Bruce C; Fraser R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Apr; 131(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 16824665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal ultrasound biometry: normative charts for a Puerto Rican population.
    de la Vega A; Ruiz-Febo N; Roberts ZC
    P R Health Sci J; 2008 Mar; 27(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18450238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.