These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10079640)

  • 1. Colposcopy may not be clinically relevant.
    Terry RR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1999 Feb; 99(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 10079640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
    Perovic S
    J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in developing countries.
    Suba EJ; Frable WJ; Raab SS
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(14):1535-6; author reply 1535-6. PubMed ID: 16598056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management of cervical dyskaryosis. Colposcopy is not cost effective.
    Jones MH; Jones JJ
    BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6949):268. PubMed ID: 8069147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colposcopy, cervical screening, and HPV. Preface.
    Waxman AG
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):xv-xvi. PubMed ID: 19061813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Health examination in Malmöhus County for the diagnosis of pre-invasive cervical cancer].
    Ahlgren M; Lindberg LG; Nordqvist S; Stormby N
    Lakartidningen; 1971 Jun; 68(30):3389-97. PubMed ID: 5096169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control in cervical cancer screening: Brazilian experience.
    Collaço LM; de Noronha L; Bleggi-Torres LF; Pinheiro DL
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 16450916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Status of screening tests for cervical cancer and its precancerous lesion].
    Zhao FH; Rong SD; Qiao YL
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Dec; 23(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 12901114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some results in the detection of cervical carcinoma.
    Mekuli S; Stambolovic B; Krajinovic S; Udicki S; Ducic S; Boskovic M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Jan; 23(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 5553175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-cost technology for screening uterine cervical cancer.
    Parashari A; Singh V; Sehgal A; Satyanarayana L; Sodhani P; Gupta MM
    Bull World Health Organ; 2000; 78(8):964-7. PubMed ID: 10994279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the increased sensitivity of the new Papanicolaou (Pap) tests improve the cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer?
    Reust CE
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Feb; 50(2):175. PubMed ID: 11219567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the sensitivity of cervical cytology: what are the issues?
    Myers ER
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):838-40. PubMed ID: 11067380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The role of colposcopy in evaluation of the cervix for unexpectedly positive pap smears].
    Jesień-Sokołowska U; Madej JG
    Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 10375918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy--another view.
    Korman J
    Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Jun; 69(3):269-70. PubMed ID: 9648601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Estimates of the cost of the introduction of colposcopy into the screening for cervical carcinoma (author's transl)].
    Schwartz FW; Heuser MR; Brecht JG
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Apr; 42(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 6920327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Should colposcopy be included in routine gynecological examination].
    Verschoof KJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1975 Jun; 119(24):952-6. PubMed ID: 1161075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scan-and-treat methodology using Azure A fast stain as a cost-effective cervical cancer screening alternative to visual inspection with acetic acid.
    Guillaud M; Benedet JL; Follen M; Crain BT; MacAulay C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S256-9. PubMed ID: 17825881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical smears.
    Br Med J; 1977 Jul; 2(6079):122-3. PubMed ID: 406005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cancer detection.
    Md State Med J; 1974 Mar; 23(3):66. PubMed ID: 4816345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Early detection of cervical cancer].
    Takano A; Sakuraniwa K; Takazawa T; Chiba Y
    Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1969 Nov; 18(12):1063-71. PubMed ID: 5395794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.