These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Crime and punishment. Opar A Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Challenges to the admissibility of DNA profiling evidence in criminal trials. Roberts H Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Apr; 22(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 8481114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Juries and crime labs: correcting the weak links in the DNA chain. McDonald R Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):345-63. PubMed ID: 9702277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA fingerprinting on trial: the dramatic early history of a new forensic technique. Aronson JD Endeavour; 2005 Sep; 29(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 16087235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The physician as gatekeeper to the use of genetic information in the criminal justice system. Seiden SC; Morin K; J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 11905274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of forensic DNA evidence in prosecutors'offices. Prottas JM; Noble AA J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 17518857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The promise and perils of criminal DNA databanking. Kimmelman J Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jul; 18(7):695-6. PubMed ID: 10888794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners. Love SH Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector. Lakra R; Dimitriadis F Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cuomo seeks genetic data of offenders. Raab S N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():27, 34. PubMed ID: 11646946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reforms in the Criminal Law. Auld Med Leg J; 2003; 71(Pt 1):18-28. PubMed ID: 12760323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Manufacturing convictions: why defendants are entitled to the data underlying forensic DNA kits. Mellon JN Duke Law J; 2001 Dec; 51(3):1097-137. PubMed ID: 11944660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science. Lynch M Endeavour; 2003 Jun; 27(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 12798816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The advent of DNA databanks: implications for information privacy. de Gorgey A Am J Law Med; 1990; 16(3):381-98. PubMed ID: 2278244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Widespread concerns still exist in relation to discrimination towards women and girls and FGM. Gerry F; Proudman C; Ali H; Home J; Rowland AG Arch Dis Child; 2021 Sep; 106(9):929. PubMed ID: 33514523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Expertise in the context of criminal law]. Vermylen Y Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 16370441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of DNA statistics in criminal trials. Henderson JP Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12175963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Science and justice from a prosecutor's perspective. Calvert-Smith D Sci Justice; 2001; 41(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 11393942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]