104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10080913)
1. Choice-Process Satisfaction: The Influence of Attribute Alignability and Option Limitation.
Zhang S; Fitzsimons GJ
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Mar; 77(3):192-214. PubMed ID: 10080913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Attribute Alignability on Product Purchase: The Moderating Role of Product Familiarity and Self-Construal.
Zhang Y; Wen Y; Hou M
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():636922. PubMed ID: 33868107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The allure of the alignable: younger and older adults' false memories of choice features.
Mather M; Knight M; McCaffrey M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 15702962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The importance of being nonalignable: a critical test of the structural alignment theory of similarity.
Estes Z; Hasson U
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1082-92. PubMed ID: 15355137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Information Processing at Successive Stages of Decision Making: Need for Cognition and Inclusion-Exclusion Effects.
Levin IP; Huneke ME; Jasper JD
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jul; 82(2):171-193. PubMed ID: 10891294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age differences in choice satisfaction: a positivity effect in decision making.
Kim S; Healey MK; Goldstein D; Hasher L; Wiprzycka UJ
Psychol Aging; 2008 Mar; 23(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18361652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alignable and nonalignable differences in causal explanations.
McGill AL
Mem Cognit; 2002 Apr; 30(3):456-68. PubMed ID: 12061766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collecting information: optimizing outcomes, screening options, or facilitating discrimination?
Harvey N; Bolger F
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):269-301. PubMed ID: 11216319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].
Masson AM; Cadot M; Ansseau M
Encephale; 2003; 29(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 14567164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.
Kane JM; Leucht S; Carpenter D; Docherty JP;
J Clin Psychiatry; 2003; 64 Suppl 12():5-19. PubMed ID: 14640142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences.
Moore DA
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 May; 78(2):146-165. PubMed ID: 10329299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Context-dependent decisions among options varying in a single dimension.
Morgan KV; Hurly TA; Bateson M; Asher L; Healy SD
Behav Processes; 2012 Feb; 89(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 21945144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction.
Botti S; Lyengar SS
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Sep; 87(3):312-26. PubMed ID: 15382982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis.
Körner C; Gertzen H; Bettinger C; Albert D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):66-84. PubMed ID: 16949538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preference for oddity: uniqueness heuristic or hierarchical choice process?
Waite TA
Anim Cogn; 2008 Oct; 11(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 18528719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the role of alignability effects in promoting uptake of energy-efficient technologies.
Hafner RJ; Elmes D; Read D
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Jun; 26(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 31724420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: skills versus patient satisfaction.
Goossensen A; Zijlstra P; Koopmanschap M
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jul; 67(1-2):50-6. PubMed ID: 17350214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Offering a treatment choice in the irradiation of prostate cancer leads to better informed and more active patients, without harm to well-being.
van Tol-Geerdink JJ; Leer JW; van Lin EN; Schimmel EC; Huizenga H; van Daal WA; Stalmeier PF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):442-8. PubMed ID: 17765404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload.
Polman E
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 May; 102(5):980-93. PubMed ID: 22429272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delay, doubt, and decision: how delaying a choice reduces the appeal of (descriptively) normative options.
van de Ven N; Gilovich T; Zeelenberg M
Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):568-73. PubMed ID: 20424103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
