These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10080913)

  • 21. The impact of phantom decoys on choices in cats.
    Scarpi D
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 20838836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relative relativity of material and experiential purchases.
    Carter TJ; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jan; 98(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 20053039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of mothers' and counselors' perceptions of predelivery counseling for extremely premature infants.
    Keenan HT; Doron MW; Seyda BA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Jul; 116(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 15995039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration.
    Wisniewski EJ; Bassok M
    Cogn Psychol; 1999; 39(3-4):208-38. PubMed ID: 10631012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consuming now or later? The interactive effect of timing and attribute alignability.
    Malkoc SA; Zauberman G; Ulu C
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 15869702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening: how does stool DNA testing fare?
    Schroy PC; Lal S; Glick JT; Robinson PA; Zamor P; Heeren TC
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Jul; 13(7):393-400. PubMed ID: 17620034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How much uncertainty is too much and how do we know? A case example of the assessment of ozone monitor network options.
    Stahl CH; Cimorelli AJ
    Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1109-20. PubMed ID: 16297218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Individual differences in decision making by foraging hummingbirds.
    Morgan KV; Hurly TA; Healy SD
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():195-200. PubMed ID: 25181327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction.
    Simon D; Krawczyk DC; Holyoak KJ
    Psychol Sci; 2004 May; 15(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 15102143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contingent Weighting in Self-Other Decision Making.
    Kray LJ
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Sep; 83(1):82-106. PubMed ID: 10973784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tradeoffs and theory: the double-mediation model.
    Scholten M; Sherman SJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):237-61. PubMed ID: 16719652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management.
    Richman MB; Forman EH; Bayazit Y; Einstein DB; Resnick MI; Stovsky MD
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2310-8. PubMed ID: 16280831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predictors of hysterectomy as a treatment for menstrual symptoms.
    Graham M; James EL; Keleher H
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 18590884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement characteristics of content-parallel single-best-answer and extended-matching questions in relation to number and source of options.
    Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S21-4. PubMed ID: 18820493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incorporating patient preferences into orthopaedic practice: should the orthopaedic encounter change?
    Bryant D; Bednarski E; Gafni A
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 16480987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors affecting patients' perceptions of choice regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    Jansen SJ; Otten W; Stiggelbout AM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Sep; 99(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 16541318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and consulting surgeon assess decision-making equally?
    Schou I; Ekeberg Ø; Ruland CM; Kåresen R
    Breast; 2002 Oct; 11(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 14965708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making.
    Raghunathan R; Pham MT
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Jul; 79(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 10388609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care.
    Spurgeon P; Hicks C; Barwell F
    Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 11399133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.