These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data. Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does aging affect the allocation of visual attention in global and local information processing? Roux F; Ceccaldi M Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 11487288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Letter cancellation performance across the adult life span. Uttl B; Pilkenton-Taylor C Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 Dec; 15(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 11935454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Behavioral and ERP evidence of greater distractor processing in old age. de Fockert JW; Ramchurn A; van Velzen J; Bergström Z; Bunce D Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():67-73. PubMed ID: 19497314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology. Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age and the ability to inhibit distractor information in visual selective attention. Kotary L; Hoyer WJ Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):159-71. PubMed ID: 7628509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postural sway during dual tasks in young and elderly adults. Prado JM; Stoffregen TA; Duarte M Gerontology; 2007; 53(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 17510558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of stimulus number and target-to-distractor ratio on the performance of random array letter cancellation tasks. Geldmacher DS Brain Cogn; 1996 Dec; 32(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 8975679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of implantation age on visual attention skills. Yucel E; Derim D Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):869-77. PubMed ID: 18395272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age differences in deactivation: a link to cognitive control? Persson J; Lustig C; Nelson JK; Reuter-Lorenz PA J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 17536972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual task interference in implicit sequence learning by young and old adults. Nejati V; Garusi Farshi MT; Ashayeri H; Aghdasi MT Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2008 Aug; 23(8):801-4. PubMed ID: 18213607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural correlates of auditory recognition under full and divided attention in younger and older adults. Fernandes MA; Pacurar A; Moscovitch M; Grady C Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2452-64. PubMed ID: 16769093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changing channels: an fMRI study of aging and cross-modal attention shifts. Townsend J; Adamo M; Haist F Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1682-92. PubMed ID: 16549368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidimensional motor sequence learning is impaired in older but not younger or middle-aged adults. Boyd LA; Vidoni ED; Siengsukon CF Phys Ther; 2008 Mar; 88(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 18096651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. Mahncke HW; Bronstone A; Merzenich MM Prog Brain Res; 2006; 157():81-109. PubMed ID: 17046669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feature processing during visual search in normal aging: electrophysiological evidence. Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E; Cadaveira F Neurobiol Aging; 2008 Jul; 29(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 17346855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of stimulus integrity on age differences in letter matching. Groth KE; Gilmore GC; Thomas CW Exp Aging Res; 2003; 29(2):155-72. PubMed ID: 12623726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]