322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10082413)
1. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Shimizu S; Kutsumi H; Fujimoto S; Kawai K
Endoscopy; 1999 Jan; 31(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10082413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Owens GR; Shutz SM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic cholangiopancreatography.
Schöfl R; Haefner M
Endoscopy; 2003 Feb; 35(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 12561008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.
Sahai AV; Devonshire D; Yeoh KG; Kay C; Feldman D; Willner I; Farber J; Patel R; Tamasky PR; Cunningham JT; Trus T; Hawes RH; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The usefulness of MRCP in the initial diagnosis of the biliary and pancreatic diseases compared with ERCP].
Iwano M; Mukai H; Mizuma Y; Takino T; Ashihara T; Ueda T; Matumura S; Fujita T; Takano Y; Fujiwara H; Watanabe A; Masuzawa A
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2880-4. PubMed ID: 9847614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [New diagnostic strategies in biliary-pancreatic diseases].
Devière J; Matos C
Rev Med Brux; 2000 Sep; 21(4):A314-7. PubMed ID: 11068486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical impact of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary disease.
Filippone A; Ambrosini R; Fuschi M; Marinelli T; Pinto D; Maggialetti A
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(1-2):27-35. PubMed ID: 12700542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnostic evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis.
Park SH; Kim MH; Kim SY; Kim HJ; Moon SH; Lee SS; Byun JH; Lee SK; Seo DW; Lee MG
Pancreas; 2010 Nov; 39(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 20467343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the next millennium.
Devereaux CE; Binmoeller KF
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Jan; 10(1):117-33, vii. PubMed ID: 10618458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic ERCP.
Ponchon T; Pilleul F
Endoscopy; 2002 Jan; 34(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 11778128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) from a radiological and gastroenterological perspective].
Vogl TJ; Zeuzem S; Zangos S; Hammerstingl R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 May; 134(19):1011-4. PubMed ID: 19401971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors].
Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in children and adolescents: experience in a single institution.
Durakbasa CU; Balik E; Yamaner S; Bulut T; Büyükuncu Y; Sökücü N; Akyüz A; Bugra D
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Aug; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 18704891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ERCP and MRCP--when and why.
Albert JG; Riemann JF
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2002 Jun; 16(3):399-419. PubMed ID: 12079266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
