109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10084278)
1. Neural networks for visual field analysis: how do they compare with other algorithms?
Lietman T; Eng J; Katz J; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 1999 Feb; 8(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 10084278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms.
Bizios D; Heijl A; Bengtsson B
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 17224745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of input data on the performance of a neural network in distinguishing normal and glaucomatous visual fields.
Bengtsson B; Bizios D; Heijl A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3730-6. PubMed ID: 16186356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of algorithms designed to classify the results from frequency doubling perimetry.
Müskens RP; Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 15491477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry.
Goldbaum MH; Sample PA; Chan K; Williams J; Lee TW; Blumenthal E; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sejnowski T; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 11773027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network.
Goldbaum MH; Sample PA; White H; Côlt B; Raphaelian P; Fechtner RD; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Aug; 35(9):3362-73. PubMed ID: 8056511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detecting movement-related EEG change by wavelet decomposition-based neural networks trained with single thumb movement.
Chen CW; Lin CC; Ju MS
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):802-14. PubMed ID: 17317306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of clinicians and an artificial neural network regarding accuracy and certainty in performance of visual field assessment for the diagnosis of glaucoma.
Andersson S; Heijl A; Bizios D; Bengtsson B
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 22583841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency doubling perimetry screening mode compared to the full-threshold mode.
Stoutenbeek R; Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):493-7. PubMed ID: 15491476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis.
Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.
Sakata LM; DeLeón-Ortega J; Girkin CA
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17301612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting visual field loss in ocular hypertensive patients using wavelet-fourier analysis of GDx scanning laser polarimetry.
Essock EA; Gunvant P; Zheng Y; Garway-Heath DF; Kotecha A; Spratt A
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 17502818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
