These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10084357)

  • 1. Bonsai testing of consumer outcome measures for the National Mental Health Strategy.
    Marosszeky NE
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1998 Dec; 32(6):888. PubMed ID: 10084357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meaningful information or a bureaucratic exercise? Exploring the value of routine outcome measurement in mental health.
    Happell B
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2008 Oct; 29(10):1098-114. PubMed ID: 18853349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Service user and significant other versions of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales.
    Stewart M
    Australas Psychiatry; 2009 Apr; 17(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 19296275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-reported consumer satisfaction in mental health services: validation of a self-rating version of the UKU-Consumer Satisfaction Rating Scale.
    Ivarsson B; Malm U
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2007; 61(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 17523031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing the validity of the Recovery Assessment Scale using an Australian sample.
    McNaught M; Caputi P; Oades LG; Deane FP
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 May; 41(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 17464738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does staff-patient agreement on needs for care predict a better mental health outcome? A 4-year follow-up in a community service.
    Lasalvia A; Bonetto C; Tansella M; Stefani B; Ruggeri M
    Psychol Med; 2008 Jan; 38(1):123-33. PubMed ID: 17537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 1. Rationale, development, and description of a computerized children's mental health intake and outcome assessment tool.
    Cunningham CE; Boyle MH; Hong S; Pettingill P; Bohaychuk D
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2009 Apr; 50(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 19017368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of an Australian sign language instrument of outcome measurement for adults in mental health settings.
    Munro L; Rodwell J
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2009 Apr; 43(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19296288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer assisted patient evaluation systems: advice from the trenches.
    Hunkeler EM; Westphal J; Williams M
    Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1996 Jun; 5(3):73-5. PubMed ID: 10158046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Further challenges in adherence research: measurements, methodologies, and mental health care.
    DiMatteo MR; Haskard KB
    Med Care; 2006 Apr; 44(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 16565628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development and use of mental health triage scales in Australia.
    Broadbent M; Moxham L; Dwyer T
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2007 Dec; 16(6):413-21. PubMed ID: 17995512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factor structure of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale--longitudinal analysis.
    Bassani DG; Dewa CS; Krupa T; Aubry T; Gehrs M; Goering PN; Streiner DL
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 May; 167(1-2):178-89. PubMed ID: 19361868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evidence for effective psychiatric admissions as measured by an audit of Health of the Nation Outcome Scales recording.
    Ganeshalingam Y; Chang D; Dunn N
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 16(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 20367833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome measures used in forensic mental health research: a structured review.
    Chambers JC; Yiend J; Barrett B; Burns T; Doll H; Fazel S; Jenkinson C; Kaur A; Knapp M; Plugge E; Sutton L; Fitzpatrick R
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2009; 19(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 19172635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.
    Wang PS; Berglund P; Olfson M; Pincus HA; Wells KB; Kessler RC
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2005 Jun; 62(6):603-13. PubMed ID: 15939838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of co-occurring substance use on 6 month outcomes for young people seeking mental health treatment.
    Baker KD; Lubman DI; Cosgrave EM; Killackey EJ; Yuen HP; Hides L; Baksheev GN; Buckby JA; Yung AR
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Nov; 41(11):896-902. PubMed ID: 17924242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research strategies for consumer empowerment of people with severe mental illness.
    Rapp CA; Shera W; Kisthardt W
    Soc Work; 1993 Nov; 38(6):727-35. PubMed ID: 8256144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the 'Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, HoNOS-D': on the feasibility and reliability of clinician-performed measurements of severity in patients with mental disorders.
    Andreas S; Harfst T; Dirmaier J; Kawski S; Koch U; Schulz H
    Psychopathology; 2007; 40(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 17215598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Australasian field trials of ICD-10.
    Kisely S
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1990 Dec; 24(4):441. PubMed ID: 2073214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The five Cs of choice. Outcome measures for individuals with severe and persistent mental illness.
    Blankertz L; Cook J; Rogers S; Hughes R
    Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1997 Aug; 6(4):62-7. PubMed ID: 10169472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.