504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10084882)
1. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Owens GR; Shutz SM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Shimizu S; Kutsumi H; Fujimoto S; Kawai K
Endoscopy; 1999 Jan; 31(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10082413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic cholangiopancreatography.
Schöfl R; Haefner M
Endoscopy; 2003 Feb; 35(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 12561008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The usefulness of MRCP in the initial diagnosis of the biliary and pancreatic diseases compared with ERCP].
Iwano M; Mukai H; Mizuma Y; Takino T; Ashihara T; Ueda T; Matumura S; Fujita T; Takano Y; Fujiwara H; Watanabe A; Masuzawa A
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2880-4. PubMed ID: 9847614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Guelrud M
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2001 Oct; 11(4):585-601, vi. PubMed ID: 11689358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Lawson JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 Dec; 46(6):580-1. PubMed ID: 9434239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the next millennium.
Devereaux CE; Binmoeller KF
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Jan; 10(1):117-33, vii. PubMed ID: 10618458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
Vrachliotis TG; Shirkhoda A; Bis KG; Shetty AN; Konez O; Ference JJ; Madrazo BL
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Aug; 38(4):295-323. PubMed ID: 9376087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.
Sahai AV; Devonshire D; Yeoh KG; Kay C; Feldman D; Willner I; Farber J; Patel R; Tamasky PR; Cunningham JT; Trus T; Hawes RH; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP).
Adamek HE; Weitz M; Breer H; Jakobs R; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Endoscopy; 1997 Oct; 29(8):741-4. PubMed ID: 9427493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [New diagnostic strategies in biliary-pancreatic diseases].
Devière J; Matos C
Rev Med Brux; 2000 Sep; 21(4):A314-7. PubMed ID: 11068486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The utilities and outlooks of MR cholangiography (MRCP) as a non contrast and noninvasive technique].
Hachiya J; Haradome H
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2747-54. PubMed ID: 9847593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography].
Finnish Gastroenterological Association's work group
Duodecim; 1999; 115(11):1262-7. PubMed ID: 11877845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
