326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10085394)
21. When are defunctioning stomas in rectal cancer surgery really reversed? Results from a population-based single center experience.
Floodeen H; Lindgren R; Matthiessen P
Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 24056133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Persistent Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Can Diverting Stoma Be Reversed Safely at 6 Months?
Hain E; Maggiori L; Manceau G; Zappa M; Prost à la Denise J; Panis Y
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 May; 59(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 27050598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High complication rate after low anterior resection for mid and high rectal cancer; results of a population-based study.
Bakker IS; Snijders HS; Wouters MW; Havenga K; Tollenaar RA; Wiggers T; Dekker JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 24655803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Septic complications after low anterior rectal resection--is diverting stoma still justified?
Leester B; Asztalos I; Polnyib C
Acta Chir Iugosl; 2002; 49(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 12587473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chronic anastomotic sinus after low anterior resection: when can the defunctioning stoma be reversed?
Fong SS; Chen K; Sim R
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Jun; 13(6):644-9. PubMed ID: 20184635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ileostomy versus colostomy: impact on functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Martellucci J; Balestri R; Brusciano L; Iacopini V; Puccini M; Docimo L; Cianchi F; Buccianti P; Prosperi P
Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 25(8):1686-1693. PubMed ID: 37461265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Time interval between rectal cancer resection and reintervention for anastomotic leakage and the impact of a defunctioning stoma: A Dutch population-based study.
Warps AK; Tollenaar RAEM; Tanis PJ; Dekker JWT;
Colorectal Dis; 2021 Nov; 23(11):2937-2947. PubMed ID: 34407272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
Mrak K; Uranitsch S; Pedross F; Heuberger A; Klingler A; Jagoditsch M; Weihs D; Eberl T; Tschmelitsch J
Surgery; 2016 Apr; 159(4):1129-39. PubMed ID: 26706610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.
Peeters KC; Tollenaar RA; Marijnen CA; Klein Kranenbarg E; Steup WH; Wiggers T; Rutten HJ; van de Velde CJ;
Br J Surg; 2005 Feb; 92(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 15584062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis.
Karanjia ND; Corder AP; Holdsworth PJ; Heald RJ
Br J Surg; 1991 Feb; 78(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 2015471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience.
Gullà N; Trastulli S; Boselli C; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Verdecchia GM; Morelli U; Gentile D; Eugeni E; Caracappa D; Listorti C; Sciannameo F; Noya G
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2011 Oct; 396(7):997-1007. PubMed ID: 21479620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Usefulness of ileostomy defunctioning stoma after anterior resection of rectum on prevention of anastomotic leakage A retrospective analysis.
Salamone G; Licari L; Agrusa A; Romano G; Cocorullo G; Falco N; Tutino R; Gulotta G
Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():155-60. PubMed ID: 27179231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Meta-analysis for high-risk factor of anastomotic leakage after anal-preserving surgery for rectal cancer].
Ye Y; Jiang H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apirl 25; 21(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 29682718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma.
Nurkin S; Kakarla VR; Ruiz DE; Cance WG; Tiszenkel HI
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e309-16. PubMed ID: 23586660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sphincter-preserving operations without defunctioning stoma.
Lee SI; Sohn SK; Park YA
ANZ J Surg; 2007 May; 77(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17497982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer.
Blok RD; Stam R; Westerduin E; Borstlap WAA; Hompes R; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1220-1225. PubMed ID: 29685761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Lefebure B; Tuech JJ; Bridoux V; Costaglioli B; Scotte M; Teniere P; Michot F
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2008 Mar; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 17768630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.
Matthiessen P; Hallböök O; Andersson M; Rutegård J; Sjödahl R
Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):462-9. PubMed ID: 15521937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection.
Ihnát P; Guňková P; Peteja M; Vávra P; Pelikán A; Zonča P
Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4809-4816. PubMed ID: 26902615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum.
Karanjia ND; Corder AP; Bearn P; Heald RJ
Br J Surg; 1994 Aug; 81(8):1224-6. PubMed ID: 7953369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
