These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10086596)
1. A biosphere modeling methodology for dose assessments of the potential Yucca Mountain deep geological high level radioactive waste repository. Watkins BM; Smith GM; Little RH; Kessler J Health Phys; 1999 Apr; 76(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 10086596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiological risk assessment and biosphere modelling for radioactive waste disposal in Switzerland. Brennwald MS; van Dorp F J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1058-61. PubMed ID: 19560845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Historical development and evolution of EPRI's post-closure dose assessment of potential releases to the biosphere from the proposed HLW repository at Yucca Mountain. Smith G; Kozak MW Health Phys; 2011 Dec; 101(6):709-21. PubMed ID: 22048489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and comparison of five site-specific biosphere models for safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal. Pröhl G; Olyslaegers G; Kanyar B; Pinedo P; Bergström U; Mobbs S; Eged K; Katona T; Simón I; Hallberg UB; Chen Q; Kowe R; Zeevaert T J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):343-73. PubMed ID: 16352869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling the impact of climate change in Germany with biosphere models for long-term safety assessment of nuclear waste repositories. Staudt C; Semiochkina N; Kaiser JC; Pröhl G J Environ Radioact; 2013 Jan; 115():214-23. PubMed ID: 22742772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of 14C and 228Ra in terms of the proposed Yucca Mountain high-level radioactive waste repository. Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Cherry RN; Sun LS Health Phys; 2006 Sep; 91(3):238-48. PubMed ID: 16891899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of low and intermediate-level radioactive waste on humans and the environment over the next one hundred thousand years. Kautsky U; Saetre P; Berglund S; Jaeschke B; Nordén S; Brandefelt J; Keesmann S; Näslund JO; Andersson E J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():395-403. PubMed ID: 26183806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The saturated zone at Yucca Mountain: an overview of the characterization and assessment of the saturated zone as a barrier to potential radionuclide migration. Eddebbarh AA; Zyvoloski GA; Robinson BA; Kwicklis EM; Reimus PW; Arnold BW; Corbet T; Kuzio SP; Faunt C J Contam Hydrol; 2003; 62-63():477-93. PubMed ID: 12714306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative radiological assessment of five European biosphere systems in the context of potential contamination of well water from the hypothetical disposal of radioactive waste. Olyslaegers G; Zeevaert T; Pinedo P; Simon I; Pröhl G; Kowe R; Chen Q; Mobbs S; Bergström U; Hallberg B; Katona T; Eged K; Kanyar B J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):375-91. PubMed ID: 16340067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent developments in assessment of long-term radionuclide behavior in the geosphere-biosphere subsystem. Smith GM; Smith KL; Kowe R; Pérez-Sánchez D; Thorne M; Thiry Y; Read D; Molinero J J Environ Radioact; 2014 May; 131():89-109. PubMed ID: 24238917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural releases from contaminated groundwater, Example Reference Biosphere 2B. Simón I; Naito M; Thorne MC; Walke R J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 15985320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture: Yucca mountain radiation standards, dose/risk assessments, thinking outside the box, evaluations, and recommendations. Moeller DW Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):376-91. PubMed ID: 19820447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limitations on upper bound dose to adults due to intake of 129I in drinking water and a total diet-implications relative to the proposed Yucca Mountain high level radioactive waste repository. Moeller DW; Ryan MT Health Phys; 2004 Jun; 86(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 15167121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The site-scale saturated zone flow model for Yucca Mountain: calibration of different conceptual models and their impact on flow paths. Zyvoloski G; Kwicklis E; Eddebbarh AA; Arnold B; Faunt C; Robinson BA J Contam Hydrol; 2003; 62-63():731-50. PubMed ID: 12714319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment of radioactive waste disposal. Agüero A; Pinedo P; Cancio D; Simón I; Moraleda M; Pérez-Sánchez D; Trueba C Sci Total Environ; 2007 Oct; 384(1-3):36-47. PubMed ID: 17588645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A model for evaluating radiological impacts on organisms other than man for use in post-closure assessments of geological repositories for radioactive wastes. Thorn MC; Kelly M; Rees JH; Sánchez-Friera P; Calvez M J Radiol Prot; 2002 Sep; 22(3):249-77. PubMed ID: 12375788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential migration of buoyant LNAPL from intermediate level waste (ILW) emplaced in a geological disposal facility (GDF) for U.K. radioactive waste. Benbow SJ; Rivett MO; Chittenden N; Herbert AW; Watson S; Williams SJ; Norris S J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Oct; 167():1-22. PubMed ID: 25147021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-closure biosphere assessment modelling: comparison of complex and more stylised approaches. Walke RC; Kirchner G; Xu S; Dverstorp B J Environ Radioact; 2015 Oct; 148():50-8. PubMed ID: 26111499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley. Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]