These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10086640)

  • 41. Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD)--a reappraisal 10 years on.
    Pace F; Bollani S; Molteni P; Bianchi Porro G
    Dig Liver Dis; 2004 Feb; 36(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 15002817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Combined pH-metry/impedance monitoring increases the diagnostic yield in patients with atypical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.
    Bajbouj M; Becker V; Neuber M; Schmid RM; Meining A
    Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):223-8. PubMed ID: 18174685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux.
    Oelschlager BK; Chang L; Pope CE; Pellegrini CA
    J Surg Res; 2005 Sep; 128(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16115493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough is not associated with night-time gastroesophageal reflux in GERD patients.
    Weigt J; Kandulski A; Büsch F; Malfertheiner P
    Dig Dis; 2009; 27(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 19439964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Distinct clinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis.
    Wu JC; Cheung CM; Wong VW; Sung JJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jun; 5(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 17481961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Diagnostic usefulness of the Carlsson-Dent questionnaire in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)].
    Gómez-Escudero O; Remes-Troche JM; Ruíz JC; Peláez-Luna M; Schmulson MJ; Valdovinos Díaz MA
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 15193059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Esophageal function studies in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Incarbone R; Bonavina L; Reitano M; Peracchia A
    Int J Surg Investig; 1999; 1(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 12774461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ambulatory oesophageal manometry and pH monitoring for investigation of chest pain: a New Zealand experience.
    Cameron R; Barclay M; Dobbs B
    N Z Med J; 2006 Mar; 119(1230):U1877. PubMed ID: 16532043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Features of gastroesophageal reflux disease in women.
    Lin M; Gerson LB; Lascar R; Davila M; Triadafilopoulos G
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Aug; 99(8):1442-7. PubMed ID: 15307857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Gastroesophageal reflux in bronchial asthma patients. A clinical note.
    Al-Asoom L; Al-Rubaish AM; El-Munshid HA; Al-Nafaie AN; Bukharie HA; Abdulrahman IS
    Saudi Med J; 2003 Dec; 24(12):1364-9. PubMed ID: 14710285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Esophageal 24-h pH monitoring: is prior manometry necessary for correct positioning of the electrode?
    Klauser AG; Schindlbeck NE; Müller-Lissner SA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Nov; 85(11):1463-7. PubMed ID: 2239874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. New developments in detection of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Emerenziani S; Sifrim D
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2005 Jul; 21(4):450-3. PubMed ID: 15930987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Optimal thresholds and discriminatory power of 48-h wireless esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosisof GERD.
    Wenner J; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Sep; 102(9):1862-9. PubMed ID: 17509034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with pathologic chronic gastroesophageal reflux].
    Csendes A; Burdiles P; Maluenda F; Cortés C; Korn O; Rojas J; Tepper P; Huertas C; Sagastume H; Puente G; Quezada F; Csendes P
    Rev Med Chil; 1998 Jul; 126(7):769-80. PubMed ID: 9830769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Evaluation of complaints and diagnostic methods, considered to be objective, in gastroesophageal reflux].
    Szendrényi V; Oláh T; Barna TK; Wittmann T; Rosztóczi A; Fehér A; Horváth OP; Balogh A
    Orv Hetil; 1996 Jan; 137(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8721857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Value of long-term ambulatory pH-metry in the assessment of patients with reflux esophagitis].
    Tomás-Ridocci M; Molina R; Monforte A; Peña A; Mora F; Benages A; Bernal JC
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1993 Dec; 84(6):351-6. PubMed ID: 8129988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Evaluation of esophageal involvement by pHmetry in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis].
    Corti RE; López Gastón AR; Feldman R; Ferro F; Voscoboinik R; Musi A
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 1987; 16(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 3425172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Current role of esophageal function studies.
    Cooper JD
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1997 Apr; 9(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 9253078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [24-hour esophageal pH in children].
    Lange A; Bonde-Petersen J; Middelfart HV; Aksglaede KB; Jensen PM; Thommesen P; Schiøtz PO
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Jan; 159(5):582-4. PubMed ID: 9045447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.