These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10086827)

  • 1. Estimating the proportion of unnecessary Cesarean sections in Ohio using birth certificate data.
    Koroukian SM; Trisel B; Rimm AA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 51(12):1327-34. PubMed ID: 10086827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Declining trends in cesarean deliveries, Ohio 1989-1996: an analysis by indications.
    Koroukian SM; Rimm AA
    Birth; 2000 Mar; 27(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 10865555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unnecessary cesarean delivery in Louisiana: an analysis of birth certificate data.
    Kabir AA; Steinmann WC; Myers L; Khan MM; Herrera EA; Yu S; Jooma N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):10-9; discussion 3A. PubMed ID: 14749628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative risk of postpartum complications in the Ohio Medicaid population: vaginal versus cesarean delivery.
    Koroukian SM
    Med Care Res Rev; 2004 Jun; 61(2):203-24. PubMed ID: 15155052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of cesarean section rates in fee-for-service versus managed care patients in the Ohio Medicaid population, 1992-1997.
    Koroukian SM; Bush D; Rimm AA
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Feb; 7(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 11216331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of Medicaid managed care on pregnant women in Ohio: a cohort analysis.
    Howell EM; Dubay L; Kenney G; Sommers AS
    Health Serv Res; 2004 Aug; 39(4 Pt 1):825-46. PubMed ID: 15230930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data.
    Kahn EB; Berg CJ; Callaghan WM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 113(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19104357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
    Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of reporting maternal in-hospital diagnoses and intrapartum procedures in Washington State linked birth records.
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Holt VL; Nelson JC; Cárdenas V; Gardella C; Easterling TR; Callaghan WM
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 19(6):460-71. PubMed ID: 16269074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section].
    Qu ZQ; Ma RM; Xiao H; Tian YQ; Li BL; Liang K; Du MY; Chen Z; Geng L; Yang MH; Tao YP; Zhu B
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 51(10):748-753. PubMed ID: 27788742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean sections in a birth center.
    Osava RH; Silva FM; Tuesta EF; Oliveira SM; Amaral MC
    Rev Saude Publica; 2011 Dec; 45(6):1036-43. PubMed ID: 22124737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Previous cesarean delivery associated with subsequent preterm birth in the United States.
    Williams CM; Asaolu I; Chavan NR; Williamson LH; Lewis AM; Beaven L; Ashford KB
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Oct; 229():88-93. PubMed ID: 30130688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004.
    Denk CE; Kruse LK; Jain NJ
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16948720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-adjusted measurement of primary cesarean sections: reliable assessment of the quality of obstetrical services.
    Pasternak DP; Pine M; Nolan K; French R
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10662103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of excess weight gain during pregnancy and macrosomia to the cesarean delivery rate, 1990-2000.
    Rhodes JC; Schoendorf KC; Parker JD
    Pediatrics; 2003 May; 111(5 Pt 2):1181-5. PubMed ID: 12728135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The boom in unnecessary caesarean surgeries is jeopardizing women's health.
    Ajeet S; Nandkishore K
    Health Care Women Int; 2013; 34(6):513-21. PubMed ID: 23477588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Florida Investigation of Primary Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery: the accuracy of the birth certificate and hospital discharge records.
    Clayton HB; Sappenfield WM; Gulitz E; Mahan CS; Petersen DJ; Stanley KM; Salihu HM
    Matern Child Health J; 2013 Jul; 17(5):869-78. PubMed ID: 22714799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of cesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000-2003.
    Malloy MH
    Pediatrics; 2008 Aug; 122(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 18676545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.
    Declercq E; Menacker F; Macdorman M
    Am J Public Health; 2006 May; 96(5):867-72. PubMed ID: 16571712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.