These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10089363)
1. Conformational attractors on the Ramachandran map. Walther D; Cohen FE Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 1999 Feb; 55(Pt 2):506-17. PubMed ID: 10089363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From Ramachandran Maps to Tertiary Structures of Proteins. DasGupta D; Kaushik R; Jayaram B J Phys Chem B; 2015 Aug; 119(34):11136-45. PubMed ID: 26098815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disallowed Ramachandran conformations of amino acid residues in protein structures. Gunasekaran K; Ramakrishnan C; Balaram P J Mol Biol; 1996 Nov; 264(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 8950277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sparsely populated residue conformations in protein structures: revisiting "experimental" Ramachandran maps. Kalmankar NV; Ramakrishnan C; Balaram P Proteins; 2014 Jul; 82(7):1101-12. PubMed ID: 23934782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An exhaustive survey of regular peptide conformations using a new metric for backbone handedness ( Mannige RV PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3327. PubMed ID: 28533975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereochemical Assessment of (φ,ψ) Outliers in Protein Structures Using Bond Geometry-Specific Ramachandran Steric-Maps. Ravikumar A; Ramakrishnan C; Srinivasan N Structure; 2019 Dec; 27(12):1875-1884.e2. PubMed ID: 31607615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigations of Ramachandran disallowed conformations in protein domain families. Lakshmi B; Ramakrishnan C; Archunan G; Sowdhamini R; Srinivasan N Int J Biol Macromol; 2014 Feb; 63():119-25. PubMed ID: 24184732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ramachandran maps for side chains in globular proteins. Rose GD Proteins; 2019 May; 87(5):357-364. PubMed ID: 30629766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structural compromise of disallowed conformations in peptide and protein structures. Ramakrishnan C; Lakshmi B; Kurien A; Devipriya D; Srinivasan N Protein Pept Lett; 2007; 14(7):672-82. PubMed ID: 17897093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental conformational energy maps of proteins and peptides. Balaji GA; Nagendra HG; Balaji VN; Rao SN Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):979-1001. PubMed ID: 28168743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between the phi distribution of the amino acids in the protein database and NMR data indicates that amino acids have various phi propensities in the random coil conformation. Serrano L J Mol Biol; 1995 Nov; 254(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 7490751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The intrinsic conformational features of amino acids from a protein coil library and their applications in force field development. Jiang F; Han W; Wu YD Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Mar; 15(10):3413-28. PubMed ID: 23385383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of side chain conformations on local conformational features of amino acids and implication for force field development. Jiang F; Han W; Wu YD J Phys Chem B; 2010 May; 114(17):5840-50. PubMed ID: 20392111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Backbone conformational preferences of an intrinsically disordered protein in solution. Espinoza-Fonseca LM; Ilizaliturri-Flores I; Correa-Basurto J Mol Biosyst; 2012 Jun; 8(6):1798-805. PubMed ID: 22506277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximum entropy reconstruction of joint phi, psi-distribution with a coil-library prior: the backbone conformation of the peptide hormone motilin in aqueous solution from phi and psi-dependent J-couplings. Massad T; Jarvet J; Tanner R; Tomson K; Smirnova J; Palumaa P; Sugai M; Kohno T; Vanatalu K; Damberg P J Biomol NMR; 2007 Jun; 38(2):107-23. PubMed ID: 17458509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding. Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of backbone solvation and electrostatics in generating preferred peptide backbone conformations: distributions of phi. Avbelj F; Baldwin RL Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 May; 100(10):5742-7. PubMed ID: 12709596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revisiting the Ramachandran plot from a new angle. Zhou AQ; O'Hern CS; Regan L Protein Sci; 2011 Jul; 20(7):1166-71. PubMed ID: 21538644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation. Lovell SC; Davis IW; Arendall WB; de Bakker PI; Word JM; Prisant MG; Richardson JS; Richardson DC Proteins; 2003 Feb; 50(3):437-50. PubMed ID: 12557186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly. Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]