These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10089603)
1. Importance of temporal-envelope cues in consonant recognition. van der Horst R; Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1801-9. PubMed ID: 10089603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure. Gilbert G; Lorenzi C J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2438-44. PubMed ID: 16642856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise. Füllgrabe C; Berthommier F; Lorenzi C Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):74-84. PubMed ID: 16289579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Infants' and Adults' Use of Temporal Cues in Consonant Discrimination. Cabrera L; Werner L Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 28338496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1053-64. PubMed ID: 8132899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition. Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP; Cote HA J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 2046366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of phonemic compression and anti-upward-spread-of-masking (anti-USOM) on the perception of articulatory features in hearing-impaired listeners. Goedegebure A; Goedegebure-Hulshof M; Verschuure H; Dreschler WA Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):414-28. PubMed ID: 12403610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Donaldson GS; Kreft HA Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech. Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sources of Variability in Consonant Perception and Implications for Speech Perception Modeling. Zaar J; Dau T Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():437-446. PubMed ID: 27080685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of temporal envelope cues by children with developmental dyslexia. Lorenzi C; Dumont A; Füllgrabe C J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 43(6):1367-79. PubMed ID: 11193958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of envelope expansion on speech recognition. Lorenzi C; Berthommier F; Apoux F; Bacri N Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):131-8. PubMed ID: 10511632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Envelope-onset asynchrony as a cue to voicing in initial english consonants. Yuan H; Reed CM; Durlach NI J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3156-67. PubMed ID: 15603161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]