These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10089610)

  • 41. Effect of initial-consonant intensity on the speed of lexical decisions.
    Fogerty D; Montgomery AA; Crass KA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):852-63. PubMed ID: 24435901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Phonotactics Constraints and the Spoken Word Recognition of Chinese Words in Speech.
    Yip MC
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 25641395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Not just a function of function words: Distal speech rate influences perception of prosodically weak syllables.
    Baese-Berk MM; Dilley LC; Henry MJ; Vinke L; Banzina E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):571-589. PubMed ID: 30488190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.
    Brown M; Salverda AP; Dilley LC; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):306-23. PubMed ID: 25621583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Identification of Minimal Pairs of Japanese Pitch Accent in Noise-Vocoded Speech.
    Sugiyama Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():887761. PubMed ID: 35712147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of speech rate and accent on access and use of semantic information.
    Sajin SM; Connine CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):619-636. PubMed ID: 26822465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch.
    Cutler A; van Donselaar W
    Lang Speech; 2001 Jun; 44(Pt 2):171-95. PubMed ID: 11575903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension.
    Birch S; Clifton C
    Lang Speech; 1995; 38 ( Pt 4)():365-91. PubMed ID: 8816086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing.
    Goslin J; Duffy H; Floccia C
    Brain Lang; 2012 Aug; 122(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 22694999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development of hemispheric specialization for lexical pitch-accent in Japanese infants.
    Sato Y; Sogabe Y; Mazuka R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2503-13. PubMed ID: 19925204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Talker adaptation in speech perception: adjusting the signal or the representations?
    Dahan D; Drucker SJ; Scarborough RA
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 18653175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of talker and foreign-accent variability on spoken word identification.
    Bent T; Holt RF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1677-86. PubMed ID: 23464037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition.
    van Donselaar W; Koster M; Cutler A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):251-73. PubMed ID: 15903117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Foreign accent strength and listener familiarity with an accent codetermine speed of perceptual adaptation.
    Witteman MJ; Weber A; McQueen JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):537-56. PubMed ID: 23456266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sentence recognition materials based on frequency of word use and lexical confusability.
    Bell TS; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001; 12(10):514-22. PubMed ID: 11791938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.