446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10089797)
1. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
Chung RP; Patel P; Ter Keurs M; Van Lith Bijl JT; Mahieu HF
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ultra-low resistance Groningen voice prosthesis: aerodynamic properties.
Chung RP; Geskus J; Mahieu HF
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999; 120(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10668359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. First clinical experience with a new non-indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox NID) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Hancock K; Houghton B; Van As-Brooks CJ; Coman W
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 125(9):981-90. PubMed ID: 16109676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ultra-low resistance Groningen voice prosthesis: clinical experiences.
Chung RP; Dagli AS; Geskus J; de Bruin MD; Mahieu HF
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2001; 122(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 11715263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical phase I/feasibility study of the next generation indwelling Provox voice prosthesis (Provox Vega).
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; van Rossum M; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 19895334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternative voice after laryngectomy using a sound-producing voice prosthesis.
van der Torn M; de Vries MP; Festen JM; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Mahieu HF
Laryngoscope; 2001 Feb; 111(2):336-46. PubMed ID: 11210885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of alaryngeal speech using a sound-producing voice prosthesis in relation to sex and pharyngoesophageal segment tonicity.
van der Torn M; van Gogh CD; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Verkerke GJ; Mahieu HF
Head Neck; 2006 May; 28(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 16470874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Hilgers FJ; Schouwenburg PF
Laryngoscope; 1990 Nov; 100(11):1202-7. PubMed ID: 2233085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Provox voice prosthesis in South Africa.
Cornu AS; Vlantis AC; Elliott H; Gregor RT
J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Jan; 117(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 12590857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual characteristics of tracheoesophageal speech production using the new indwelling Provox Vega voice prosthesis: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
Ward EC; Hancock K; Lawson N; van As-Brooks CJ
Head Neck; 2011 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20848411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conversion from a non-indwelling to a Provox2 indwelling voice prosthesis for speech rehabilitation: comparison of voice quality and patient preference.
Vlantis AC; Gregor RT; Elliot H; Oudes M
J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Oct; 117(10):815-20. PubMed ID: 14653926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Voice prostheses or esophageal replacement voice?].
Daniilidis I; Nikolaou A; Markou C; Kotsani A
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Feb; 77(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 9555702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aerodynamic and sound intensity measurements in tracheoesophageal voice.
Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tan FM; Tange RA; Schouwenburg PF
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 17127821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Voice rehabilitation with the Provox system after total laryngectomy].
Slavícek A; Jablonický P; Betka J; Jedlicka I
Sb Lek; 1997; 98(4):287-99. PubMed ID: 9648605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Voice prostheses with sound-producing metal reed element--an experimental study and initial clinical results].
Hagen R; Berning K; Korn M; Schön F
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jun; 77(6):312-21. PubMed ID: 9701754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Voice restoration by primary insertion of indwelling voice prosthesis following circumferential pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal graft.
Furuta Y; Homma A; Nagahashi T; Oridate N; Mesuda Y; Nishizawa N; Sekido M; Yamamoto Y; Okushiba S; Fukuda S
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Sep; 32(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 15885952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Voice quality in laryngectomees with phonatory prosthesis].
Ruiz Franco M; Miralles Adell JL; Marco Algarra J; García Rodríguez A; Armengot Carceller M
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1989; 40(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 2631908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective clinical phase II study of two new indwelling voice prostheses (Provox Vega 22.5 and 20 Fr) and a novel anterograde insertion device (Provox Smart Inserter).
Hilgers FJ; Ackerstaff AH; Jacobi I; Balm AJ; Tan IB; van den Brekel MW
Laryngoscope; 2010 Jun; 120(6):1135-43. PubMed ID: 20513030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The voice and speech quality in laryngectomy patients rehabilitated with second generation voice prosthesis].
Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Łuczaj J; Kasperuk J
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Sep; 25(147):230-5. PubMed ID: 19112837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with voice prostheses. Results of a prospective follow-up study].
de Maddalena H; Maassen M; Arold R; Ptok M; Zenner HP
Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Aug; 71(8):416-22. PubMed ID: 1388467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
