180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10089798)
1. [Comparative intensity-pressure study of patients with a voice prosthesis].
Marraco M; Despons JL; Devars F; Carrat X; Traissac L
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 10089798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative evaluation of the voice prosthesis after laryngectomy].
Kischk BT; Gross M
HNO; 1995 May; 43(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 7607916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Voice prostheses with sound-producing metal reed element--an experimental study and initial clinical results].
Hagen R; Berning K; Korn M; Schön F
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jun; 77(6):312-21. PubMed ID: 9701754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative voice after laryngectomy using a sound-producing voice prosthesis.
van der Torn M; de Vries MP; Festen JM; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Mahieu HF
Laryngoscope; 2001 Feb; 111(2):336-46. PubMed ID: 11210885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aerodynamic and sound intensity measurements in tracheoesophageal voice.
Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tan FM; Tange RA; Schouwenburg PF
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 17127821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vocal efficiency in tracheoesophageal phonation.
Grolman W; Eerenstein SE; Tange RA; Canu G; Bogaardt H; Dijkhuis JP; Dreschler WA; Schouwenburg PF
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2008 Mar; 35(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 17959326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
Chung RP; Patel P; Ter Keurs M; Van Lith Bijl JT; Mahieu HF
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Terada T; Saeki N; Toh K; Uwa N; Sagawa K; Takayasu S; Sakagami M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17137738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First clinical experience with a new non-indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox NID) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Hancock K; Houghton B; Van As-Brooks CJ; Coman W
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Sep; 125(9):981-90. PubMed ID: 16109676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy using the Newvox voice prosthesis.
Traissac L; Chene G; Devars F; Houliat T; Essalki I; Bekhar H; Rousseau A
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2007; 128(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 18323328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Voice rehabilitation with a voice prosthesis. Study of 62 patients with 5 years follow-up].
de Raucourt D; Rame JP; Daliphard F; Le Pennec D; Béquignon A; Luquet A
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):297-300. PubMed ID: 10089796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Voice rehabilitation with the Provox system after total laryngectomy].
Slavícek A; Jablonický P; Betka J; Jedlicka I
Sb Lek; 1997; 98(4):287-99. PubMed ID: 9648605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a membrane-based voice-producing element for laryngectomized women.
Tack JW; Qiu Q; Schutte HK; Kooijman PG; Meeuwis CA; van der Houwen EB; Mahieu HF; Verkerke GJ
Head Neck; 2008 Sep; 30(9):1156-66. PubMed ID: 18642281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Phonatory rehabilitation via esophageal voice and the laryngophone].
Motta S
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1992; 12(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 1298148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Voice quality in laryngectomees with phonatory prosthesis].
Ruiz Franco M; Miralles Adell JL; Marco Algarra J; García Rodríguez A; Armengot Carceller M
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1989; 40(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 2631908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of a double-membrane-based voice-producing element for laryngectomized patients.
Tack JW; Rakhorst G; van der Houwen EB; Mahieu HF; Verkerke GJ
Head Neck; 2007 Jul; 29(7):665-74. PubMed ID: 17252591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compliance, quality of life and quantitative voice quality aspects of hands-free speech.
Op de Coul BM; Ackerstaff AH; van As-Brooks CJ; van den Hoogen FJ; Meeuwis CA; Manni JJ; Hilgers FJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 16076712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Acoustic analysis of the voice restored by using a tracheoesophageal slit-like fistula].
Jin GW; Yang CH; Xu KX; Xu ZR; Li SC; Chen J; Zhang JX; Zhang ZL
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 14515786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual characteristics of tracheoesophageal speech production using the new indwelling Provox Vega voice prosthesis: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
Ward EC; Hancock K; Lawson N; van As-Brooks CJ
Head Neck; 2011 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20848411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The voice and speech quality in laryngectomy patients rehabilitated with second generation voice prosthesis].
Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Łuczaj J; Kasperuk J
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Sep; 25(147):230-5. PubMed ID: 19112837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
