These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10090797)

  • 1. Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support.
    Brenner LA; Koehler DJ
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):16-47. PubMed ID: 10090797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty.
    Fox CR
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):167-89. PubMed ID: 10090802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evidential support accumulation model of subjective probability.
    Koehler DJ; White CM; Grondin R
    Cogn Psychol; 2003 Mar; 46(2):152-97. PubMed ID: 12643893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The probability of causal conditionals.
    Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing.
    Khrennikov A
    Biosystems; 2009 Mar; 95(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 19010383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preferences for different questions when testing hypotheses in an abstract task: positivity does play a role, asymmetry does not.
    Cherubini P; Rusconi P; Russo S; Di Bari S; Sacchi S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 20223439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forecasting trial outcomes: lawyers assign higher probability to possibilities that are described in greater detail.
    Fox CR; Birke R
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Apr; 26(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 11985296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?
    Griffin D; Buehler R
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):48-78. PubMed ID: 10090798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence.
    Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive learning via selectionism and Bayesianism, Part I: connection between the two.
    Zhang J
    Neural Netw; 2009 Apr; 22(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 19386469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision making for pregnant adolescents: applying reasoned action theory to research and treatment.
    Cervera NJ
    Fam Soc; 1993 Jun; 74(6):355-65. PubMed ID: 12318643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hail the impossible: p-values, evidence, and likelihood.
    Johansson T
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Apr; 52(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 21077903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Explanation and estimation of subjective probability by generalized model of Support Theory].
    Saito K; Shigemasu K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1997 Aug; 68(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 9394426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Models based on value and probability in health improve shared decision making.
    Ortendahl M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):714-7. PubMed ID: 19018900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.