These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10090800)

  • 1. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence.
    Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty.
    Fox CR
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):167-89. PubMed ID: 10090802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.
    Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality.
    Ahn W; Kim NS; Lassaline ME; Dennis MJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2000 Dec; 41(4):361-416. PubMed ID: 11121260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two faces of (dis)similarity in affective judgments of persons: contrast or assimilation effects revealed by morphs.
    Ruys KI; Spears R; Gordijn EH; de Vries NK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):399-411. PubMed ID: 16594827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support.
    Brenner LA; Koehler DJ
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):16-47. PubMed ID: 10090797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
    de Queiroz K; Poe S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generating and evaluating options for decision making: the impact of sequentially presented evidence.
    Sprenger A; Dougherty MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):550-75. PubMed ID: 22082233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account.
    Mandel DR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
    Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kin recognition signals in adult faces.
    DeBruine LM; Smith FG; Jones BC; Roberts SC; Petrie M; Spector TD
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18948132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgment dissociation theory: an analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning.
    Mandel DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):419-34. PubMed ID: 13678376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wavelet modelling of collinearity judgment error.
    Greene E; Ogden RT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):189-210. PubMed ID: 17535478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantum geometric model of similarity.
    Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Trueblood JS
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):679-96. PubMed ID: 23915087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.