These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10090801)

  • 1. On the shape of the probability weighting function.
    Gonzalez R; Wu G
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):129-66. PubMed ID: 10090801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition.
    Hilbig BE; Glöckner A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov; 138(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 21974869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Models based on value and probability in health improve shared decision making.
    Ortendahl M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):714-7. PubMed ID: 19018900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.
    Patalano AL; Zax A; Williams K; Mathias L; Cordes S; Barth H
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101273. PubMed ID: 32028073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The parasite capacity of the host population].
    Kozminskiĭ EV
    Parazitologiia; 2002; 36(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 11965643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty plus prior equals rational bias: an intuitive Bayesian probability weighting function.
    Fennell J; Baddeley R
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Oct; 119(4):878-87. PubMed ID: 22800412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk.
    Trepel C; Fox CR; Poldrack RA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15795132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Ayton P; Dent J; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1487-505. PubMed ID: 19857019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Willingness to pay for reductions in health risks when probabilities are distorted.
    Bleichrodt H; Eeckhoudt L
    Health Econ; 2006 Feb; 15(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 16331723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychological cue use and implications for a clinical decision support system.
    Buckingham CD
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2002 Dec; 27(4):237-51. PubMed ID: 12745905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does information about probability count in choices under risk?
    Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value-induced bias in medical decision making.
    Levy AG; Hershey JC
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 18349431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferences for 'life-saving' programmes: small for all or gambling for the prize?
    Gyrd-Hansen D; Kristiansen IS
    Health Econ; 2008 Jun; 17(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 17990283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision making in ambiguous and risky situations after unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy surgery.
    Bonatti E; Kuchukhidze G; Zamarian L; Trinka E; Bodner T; Benke T; Delazer M
    Epilepsy Behav; 2009 Apr; 14(4):665-73. PubMed ID: 19233314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partition-edit-count: naive extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probability.
    Fox CR; Levav J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):626-42. PubMed ID: 15584810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)?
    Ungemach C; Chater N; Stewart N
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 19399978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in causal learning and decision making.
    Osman M; Shanks DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 15982627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.