BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10090918)

  • 1. Down-weighting of multiple affected sib pairs leads to biased likelihood-ratio tests, under the assumption of no linkage.
    Greenwood CM; Bull SB
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1248-52. PubMed ID: 10090918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.
    Xu X; Weiss S; Xu X; Wei LJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):1025-8. PubMed ID: 10961909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of transmission-ratio distortion on allele sharing in affected sibling pairs.
    Greenwood CM; Morgan K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2001-4. PubMed ID: 10775526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of tests for association and linkage in incomplete families.
    Cervino AC; Hill AV
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 10841813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A statistical method for identification of polymorphisms that explain a linkage result.
    Sun L; Cox NJ; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):399-411. PubMed ID: 11791210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing the robustness of the new Haseman-Elston quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.
    Allison DB; Fernández JR; Heo M; Beasley TM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 10820126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonpaternity in linkage studies of extremely discordant sib pairs.
    Neale MC; Neale BM; Sullivan PF
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):526-9. PubMed ID: 11745068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs.
    Sham PC; Purcell S
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1527-32. PubMed ID: 11353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on power approximations for the transmission/disequilibrium test.
    Knapp M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 10090903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
    Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.
    McPeek MS; Sun L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1076-94. PubMed ID: 10712219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
    Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.
    Forrest WF; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1642-60. PubMed ID: 10762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families.
    Tu IP; Balise RR; Whittemore AS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1341-50. PubMed ID: 10739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals.
    Epstein MP; Duren WL; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Nov; 67(5):1219-31. PubMed ID: 11032786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method.
    Wang D; Lin S; Cheng R; Gao X; Wright FA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1238-49. PubMed ID: 11309688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.
    Sham PC; Cherny SS; Purcell S; Hewitt JK
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1616-30. PubMed ID: 10762547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equivalence of single- and multilocus markers: power to detect linkage with composite markers derived from biallelic loci.
    Wilson AF; Sorant AJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1610-5. PubMed ID: 10762546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.